2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature–time evolution of the Assynt Terrane of the Lewisian Gneiss Complex of Northwest Scotland from zircon U-Pb dating and Ti thermometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(). These methods have been used to great effect in a number of studies where the range of zircon and garnet chemistry and morphologies are relatively simple (Clark et al., , ; Gauthiez‐Putallaz, Rubatto, & Hermann, ; Hermann & Rubatto, ; Kotková & Harley, ; Kotková, Whitehouse, Schaltegger, & D'Abzac, ; Kylander‐Clark & Hacker, ; MacDonald et al., ; Štípská et al., ). The utility of these techniques in visualizing equilibrium relationships in terranes that have experienced multiple episodes or protracted durations of metamorphism becomes increasingly complex as zircon undergoes varying degrees of recrystallization, re‐equilibration and neocrystallization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(). These methods have been used to great effect in a number of studies where the range of zircon and garnet chemistry and morphologies are relatively simple (Clark et al., , ; Gauthiez‐Putallaz, Rubatto, & Hermann, ; Hermann & Rubatto, ; Kotková & Harley, ; Kotková, Whitehouse, Schaltegger, & D'Abzac, ; Kylander‐Clark & Hacker, ; MacDonald et al., ; Štípská et al., ). The utility of these techniques in visualizing equilibrium relationships in terranes that have experienced multiple episodes or protracted durations of metamorphism becomes increasingly complex as zircon undergoes varying degrees of recrystallization, re‐equilibration and neocrystallization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zircon-garnet partitioning relationship is often assessed through interpretation of HREE patterns of zircon or the construction of D REE (zircon-garnet) plots that are then visually compared to the appropriate experimental data sets of Rubatto and Hermann (2007) or Taylor, Harley, et al (2015). These methods have been used to great effect in a number of studies where the range of zircon and garnet chemistry and morphologies are relatively simple (Clark et al, 2009Gauthiez-Putallaz, Rubatto, & Hermann, 2016;Kotkov a & Harley, 2010;Kotkov a, Whitehouse, Schaltegger, & D'Abzac, 2016;Kylander-Clark & Hacker, 2014;MacDonald et al, 2015; St ıpsk a et al, 2016). The utility of these techniques in visualizing equilibrium relationships in terranes that have experienced multiple episodes or protracted durations of metamorphism becomes increasingly complex as zircon undergoes varying degrees of recrystallization, re-equilibration and neocrystallization.…”
Section: An Assessment Of Zircon-garnet Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Archaean granulite-facies assemblages are well-preserved in the TTG gneisses, with limited Laxfordian reworking that is focused along discrete shear zones (Sutton and Watson, 1951;Tarney and Weaver, 1987;Kinny and Friend, 2005;Wheeler et al, 2010;Zirkler et al, 2012;MacDonald et al, 2015). Although the terrane is dominated by TTG gneisses, mafic to ultramafic and metasedimentary pods are found in a number of locations within the gneisses (Davies, 1974;Cartwright et al, 1985;Kinny and Friend, 2005;Goodenough et al, 2010).…”
Section: Geological Setting: the Lewisian Gneiss Complexmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1; Burton et al, 2000) yielding likely crystallisation dates of 2.68 ± 0.02 Ga and 3.26 Ga ± 0.21 Ga (2σ), while Sm-Nd dating (Whitehouse, 1989) of the Achiltibuie, Drumbeg and Scouriemore Complexes yielded dates of 2.85 Ga ± 0.10 Ga, 2.91 Ga ± 0.06 Ga and 2.67 Ga ± 0.11 Ga (2σ) respectively. U-Pb zircon geochronology from TTG gneisses in northern Central Region yielded similarly disparate results, with a spread of concordant ages from 3.1 to 2.5 Ga (Whitehouse and Kemp, 2010;MacDonald et al, 2015) attributed, in part, to Pb diffusion during the LGC's protracted, high-grade metamorphic evolution (MacDonald et al, 2013). Despite these disturbances to the U-Pb isotopic system, the protolith crystallisation ages for the TTG gneiss protoliths in the north of the Central Region are generally interpreted as 3.05 -2.90 Ga (e.g., Kinny and Friend, 1997;MacDonald et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ultramafic-mafic Complexes In the Central Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U-Pb zircon geochronology from TTG gneisses in northern Central Region yielded similarly disparate results, with a spread of concordant ages from 3.1 to 2.5 Ga (Whitehouse and Kemp, 2010;MacDonald et al, 2015) attributed, in part, to Pb diffusion during the LGC's protracted, high-grade metamorphic evolution (MacDonald et al, 2013). Despite these disturbances to the U-Pb isotopic system, the protolith crystallisation ages for the TTG gneiss protoliths in the north of the Central Region are generally interpreted as 3.05 -2.90 Ga (e.g., Kinny and Friend, 1997;MacDonald et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ultramafic-mafic Complexes In the Central Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%