1997
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-997-0062-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature variation of optical energy gap values of the compound CuGaTe2

Abstract: Measurements of optical absorption in the temperature range 20 to 300K were made on polycrstalline samples of the compound CuGaTe 2 . These results were used to determine values of the optical energy gap E g as a function of temperature T. The resulting curves of E g vs T were fitted to a simplified Manoogian-Leclerc equation and the fitted coefficients used to give values of (dE g /dT) 1 and (dE g /dT) 2 , due to lattice dilation and electron-phonon contributions, respectively. Hence, the deformation potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 the calculated ΔEnormalGGGA ≈ 0.99 eV is also underestimated as was obtained by using for CuGaTe 2 the value EnormalGnormalexp = 1.23 eV . A more reliable value of ΔEnormalGGGA for Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 (ΔEnormalGGGA ≈ 1.20 eV) is calculated by taken EnormalGnormalexp ≈ 1.40 eV for the band gap of CuGaTe 2 , a value which has been recently obtained for high quality crystals of this material by photoluminescence and optical absorption measurements . Thus, using ΔnormalEnormalGGGA ≈ 1.20 eV, EnormalGth = (1.22 ± 0.15) eV is obtained for KS‐Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 , which is in reasonable agreement with EnormalGnormalexp ≈ 1.49 eV obtained in the present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, for Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 the calculated ΔEnormalGGGA ≈ 0.99 eV is also underestimated as was obtained by using for CuGaTe 2 the value EnormalGnormalexp = 1.23 eV . A more reliable value of ΔEnormalGGGA for Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 (ΔEnormalGGGA ≈ 1.20 eV) is calculated by taken EnormalGnormalexp ≈ 1.40 eV for the band gap of CuGaTe 2 , a value which has been recently obtained for high quality crystals of this material by photoluminescence and optical absorption measurements . Thus, using ΔnormalEnormalGGGA ≈ 1.20 eV, EnormalGth = (1.22 ± 0.15) eV is obtained for KS‐Cu 2 ZnGeTe 4 , which is in reasonable agreement with EnormalGnormalexp ≈ 1.49 eV obtained in the present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Therefore, even basic parameters of CGT, such as the band-gap energy (E g ) and its temperature dependence in CGT, were not correctly measured until recently. 1 The same was true with the lowtemperature photoluminescence ͑PL͒ properties of CGT crystals. The first detailed study was only recently published by Krustok et al 2 In Ref.…”
Section: ͓S0021-8979͑99͒03221-1͔mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Figure 11 compiles our new data obtained for CuGaS 2 and compares them with literature data for CuGaSe 2 and CuGaTe 2 . 53,54 The temperature dependence of the exciton energies of all CuGaX 2 chalcopyrites shown in Fig. 11 was initially analyzed by fitting a single Bose-Einstein frequency according to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%