1996
DOI: 10.1121/1.415968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Template-based automatic recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings

Abstract: The application of dynamic time warping (DTW) to the automated analysis of continuous recordings of animal vocalizations is evaluated. The DTW algorithm compares an input signal with a set of predefined templates representative of categories chosen by the investigator. It directly compares signal spectrograms, and identifies constituents and constituent boundaries, thus permitting the identification of a broad range of signals and signal components. When applied to vocalizations of an indigo bunting (Passerina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
115
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithms for species identification have been developed using spectrogram matched filtering (Clark, Marler & Beeman, 1987;Chabot, 1988), statistical feature extraction (Taylor, 1995;Grigg et al, 1996), k-Nearest neighbor algorithm (Han, Muniandy & Dayou, 2011;Gunasekaran & Revathy, 2010), Support Vector Machine (Fagerlund, 2007;Acevedo et al, 2009), treebased classifiers (Adams, Law & Gibson, 2010;Henderson, Hildebrand & Smith 2011) and template based detection (Anderson, Dave & Margoliash, 1996;Mellinger & Clark, 2000), but most of these algorithms are built for a specific species and there was no infrastructure provided for the user to create models for other species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms for species identification have been developed using spectrogram matched filtering (Clark, Marler & Beeman, 1987;Chabot, 1988), statistical feature extraction (Taylor, 1995;Grigg et al, 1996), k-Nearest neighbor algorithm (Han, Muniandy & Dayou, 2011;Gunasekaran & Revathy, 2010), Support Vector Machine (Fagerlund, 2007;Acevedo et al, 2009), treebased classifiers (Adams, Law & Gibson, 2010;Henderson, Hildebrand & Smith 2011) and template based detection (Anderson, Dave & Margoliash, 1996;Mellinger & Clark, 2000), but most of these algorithms are built for a specific species and there was no infrastructure provided for the user to create models for other species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syllable onsets and offsets were identified by mapping individual syllable waveforms to amplitude derivative templates using a modified dynamic time-warping algorithm (Rabiner and Juang, 1993;Anderson et al, 1996). Our implementation was developed to match waveform peaks to corresponding templates by finding a warping of time that maximizes the average product of the template and candidate waveforms.…”
Section: Temporal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We naturally expect repeated structure in most poetry [13], and although this short poem only has 24 lines in two stanzas, we do find two obvious repetitions as the audio motif (the last line of both verses). 2 This (carefully annotated) code, along with all code and data used in this work is archived at [19]. [19] to hear the original sound file and the discovered motifs.…”
Section: A Intuition Behind Audio Motif Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds, though still a common sight even in cities, are facing threats from habitat reduction. While bird songs have been explored in several research efforts [2][5], like human sound processing, the algorithms tend to be very specialized and parameter-laden. How well can we do with no parameters?…”
Section: B Motif Discovery In Bird Songsmentioning
confidence: 99%