2022
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and geographical variations in survival of children born with congenital anomalies in Europe: A multi‐registry cohort study

Abstract: Background: Congenital anomalies are a major cause of perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality. Objectives: The aim was to investigate temporal changes and geographical variation in survival of children with major congenital anomalies (CA) in different European areas. Methods: In this population-based linkage cohort study, 17 CA registries members of EUROCAT, the European network for the surveillance of CAs, successfully linked data on 115,219 live births with CAs to mortality records. Registries estimated Kap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of the children that had surgery was generally higher in Wales and the three English regions and lower in Finland. A possible explanation may be that the Finnish EUROCAT registry includes more children with less severe anomalies than the English EUROCAT registries 15 . Another possibility is that we may not have had the complete list of surgery codes for Finland as the surgical procedures were identified using three‐digit codes rather than more specific codes 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The percentage of the children that had surgery was generally higher in Wales and the three English regions and lower in Finland. A possible explanation may be that the Finnish EUROCAT registry includes more children with less severe anomalies than the English EUROCAT registries 15 . Another possibility is that we may not have had the complete list of surgery codes for Finland as the surgical procedures were identified using three‐digit codes rather than more specific codes 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation may be that the Finnish EUROCAT registry includes more children with less severe anomalies than the English EUROCAT registries 15 . Another possibility is that we may not have had the complete list of surgery codes for Finland as the surgical procedures were identified using three‐digit codes rather than more specific codes 15 . It is well‐known that there are differences in the prevalence of congenital anomalies requiring surgery across Europe with higher rates of gastroschisis and neural tube defects in England and Wales 16,17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Survival of children with major CAs beyond one year has substantially improved during the last few decades due to advances in neonatal care and surgical interventions. 7,8 As shown in our recent multi-centre European study, 10year survival exceeded 90% for most major structural anomalies and the commonest chromosomal anomaly, Down syndrome (trisomy 21). 9 Trisomy 13 (T13) (Patau syndrome) and trisomy 18 (T18) (Edwards syndrome) are the most common autosomal trisomies after Down syndrome and are characterised by multiple structural anomalies and intellectual disability in survivors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They are also a growing contributor to mortality of children under 5 years of age5 and of older children 6. Survival of children with major CAs beyond 1 year has substantially improved during the last few decades due to advances in neonatal care and surgical interventions 7 8. As shown in our recent multi-centre European study, 10-year survival exceeded 90% for most major structural anomalies and the most common chromosomal anomaly, Down syndrome (trisomy 21) 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the investigation of survival rates, data on mortality were obtained through linkage with vital statistics and mortality databases. A detailed description of the methods has been published elsewhere 14–16…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%