2021
DOI: 10.1111/oik.07615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and sociocultural effects of human colonisation on native biodiversity: filtering and rates of adaptation

Abstract: Modern human societies have negatively impacted native species richness and their adaptive capacity on every continent, in clearly contrasting ways. We propose a general model to explain how the sequence, duration and type of colonising society alter native species richness patterns through changes in evolutionary pressures. These changes cause different ‘filtering effects' on native species, while simultaneously altering the capacity of surviving species to adapt to further anthropogenic pressures. This frame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research further indicates that human land use prior to the 20th century was spatially and temporally heterogeneous, such that locally strong influences did not necessarily scale up to the regional level (Roos et al., 2022)⁠. Thus, depending on the spatial and time scale of the considered baseline, conservation references can correspond to environments strongly degraded by recent high‐intensity economies, to biodiverse cultural landscapes shaped and sustained by prior societies, or to prehuman environments (Amiot et al., 2021; Ellis et al., 2021)⁠.…”
Section: Time Scales For References and Prehuman Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research further indicates that human land use prior to the 20th century was spatially and temporally heterogeneous, such that locally strong influences did not necessarily scale up to the regional level (Roos et al., 2022)⁠. Thus, depending on the spatial and time scale of the considered baseline, conservation references can correspond to environments strongly degraded by recent high‐intensity economies, to biodiverse cultural landscapes shaped and sustained by prior societies, or to prehuman environments (Amiot et al., 2021; Ellis et al., 2021)⁠.…”
Section: Time Scales For References and Prehuman Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%