2000
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00337-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and spatial expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2, -4, and -7 during distraction osteogenesis in rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
101
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, only one set of material properties was used for both the regenerate and medullary tissue. This rendered the analysis most applicable to the early stages of the distraction phase, when only granular and loose connective tissues, rather than mineralized tissues, are present in the regenerate (Rauch et al, 2000;Tay et al, 1998). We also assumed that the tissues did not become damaged during distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, only one set of material properties was used for both the regenerate and medullary tissue. This rendered the analysis most applicable to the early stages of the distraction phase, when only granular and loose connective tissues, rather than mineralized tissues, are present in the regenerate (Rauch et al, 2000;Tay et al, 1998). We also assumed that the tissues did not become damaged during distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include sustained proliferation of osteoblast progenitor cells in the center of the distraction gap (Aronson et al, 1997;Li et al, 1997), marked increases in blood flow and vascular proliferation in the region (Aronson, 1994;Choi et al, 2000;Rowe et al, 1999), and upregulation within the gap of growth factors and matrix proteins involved in bone formation (e.g. TGFβ-1, BMP-2, BMP-4, IGF I, bFGF, OPN) Liu et al, 1999;Mehrara et al, 1999;Rauch et al, 2000;Sato et al, 1999;Sato et al, 1998;Weiss et al, 2002). Similar results have been reported for experiments in which the lengthening phase of DO is compared to healing following a simple osteotomy (no distraction) (Aronson et al, 1997;Lammens et al, 1998;Weiss et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Recently, several animal studies have described the expression patterns of BMPs during distraction osteogenesis in long bones or mandibles. [5][6][7] BMPs were shown to play vital roles in governing new bone formation after osteodistraction. Therefore, introducing BMPs into the distraction gap may be a reasonable approach to accelerate callus formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point in time coincided with the end of active lengthening, which is characterized by the highest expression of angiogenic and osteotropic growth factors (eg, bone morphogenetic proteins, insulin-like growth factor I, and transforming growth factor β) and thus the highest rate of bone formation. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Because densitometric image analysis revealed the mean area of new bone formation in the distraction group to be more than twice the size of that in the osteotomy group 6 weeks after surgery, we expected that the delayedimage-to-region-of-interest ratio would reveal this difference. Whether the lack of increase in the region-ofinterest ratio can be attributed to a different rate of uptake of 99m Tc-HDP during intramembranous bone formation is uncertain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upregulation of bone metabolism outside the lengthening zone, mediated via production of osteotropic and angiogenic growth factors during the distraction procedure, may play a role in this finding. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Potentially significant differences between the regions of interest may have been obscured by the sample size in the present study, but differences would be less relevant, compared with results of densitometric image analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%