1986
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt aftereffect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
72
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual growth and decay functions of the aftereffect have approximately the same slope, thus adaptation and recovery appear to be fairly symmetric processes. This has also been reported for the tilt aftereffect (Magnussen and Johnsen, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The individual growth and decay functions of the aftereffect have approximately the same slope, thus adaptation and recovery appear to be fairly symmetric processes. This has also been reported for the tilt aftereffect (Magnussen and Johnsen, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, Mecacci and Spinelli (1976) reported that the amplitude reduction observed in the human visual evoked potentia1 first stabilized after 15 min adaptation to high-contrast gratings. Some later psychophysical results by Bodinger (1978) likewise suggested that it might take longer adaptation times to reach magnitude saturation, and recent extensive experiments on the threshold elevation and tilt aftereffects show that there is a steady growth during at least 20-30 min of adaptation (Bjiirklund and Magnussen, 1981;Rose and Evans, 1983;Magnussen and Johnsen, 1986). There is no evidence for saturation in these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, the straight lines in figure 4d indicate that the aftereffect decay is nearly exponential over time. Note that this exponential decay is characteristic of aftereffects of motion (Sekuler 1975; Keck & Pentz 1977), orientation (Wolfe 1984;Magnussen & Johnsen 1986;Harris & Calvert 1989) and shape (Krauskopf 1954). We next considered a more subtle aspect of the adaptation dynamics, again for purposes of comparison to previous work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope parameter does not significantly differ from unity at the 0.01 probability level, suggesting that the proportionality rule holds within this range. This proportionality rule also appears to hold for the suprathreshold appearance of the orientation of lines or gratings following adaptation, as the buiIdup and decay of the tilt aftereffect show similar time courses (Magnussen & Johnsen, 1986;Greeniee & Magnussen, 1987). Thus, contrast adaptation appears to be like a short-term memory store where the effects of adaptation persist for a length of time proportional to the adapting time.…”
Section: Contrast Gain Control and Neurai Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%