2006
DOI: 10.1021/es052427h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Bioavailability of Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs

Abstract: Because PCBs and organochlorine pesticides continue to be of global concern, studies that address information gaps, such as factors and influences of spatial and temporal effects on contaminant bioavailability, are valuable. The present study focused on the spatial and temporal distribution of bioavailable organochlorine pesticides and PCBs in surface waters of a contaminated harbor. Passive sampling devices were intensively deployed adjacent to various land uses on the Willamette River, OR, including Portland… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was designed specifically to respond to issues of reproducibility and variability associated with sampling with PSDs at the Portland Harbor Superfund site. Future study plans for Portland Harbor contemplated site-specific hypotheses that were not evaluated in prior work, which focused on broader spatial and temporal trends [5,6,12]. The study presented here was proposed to help preemptively define study-design and analysis options for future work as well as examine options for incorporating data from earlier studies with limited replication into current and future site assessments (such as evaluating the success of remediation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was designed specifically to respond to issues of reproducibility and variability associated with sampling with PSDs at the Portland Harbor Superfund site. Future study plans for Portland Harbor contemplated site-specific hypotheses that were not evaluated in prior work, which focused on broader spatial and temporal trends [5,6,12]. The study presented here was proposed to help preemptively define study-design and analysis options for future work as well as examine options for incorporating data from earlier studies with limited replication into current and future site assessments (such as evaluating the success of remediation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water cages were purchased from Environmental Sampling Technologies, Inc. (St. Joseph, MO) with all polymers co-deployed within the same cage, and multiple cages deployed at each site in both sampling years. The deployment system consisted of an anchor, steel cable, water cages, and two buoys: one for buoyancy, and another on top for retrieval (Sethajintanin and Anderson, 2006). Each cage was approximately 2.5 meters off the bottom of the river.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, laboratory methods were employed to optimize silicone pre-deployment cleaning to reduce background chromatographic interferences, and for infusing silicone with labeled internal standards for uptake rates and water concentration estimates. Second, we compared five silicone polymers in a field application at a Portland Harbor Superfund site with a history of POP (including PAH and pesticide) contamination (Sethajintanin and Anderson, 2006; Sower and Anderson, 2008). Sequestration data and operational logistics were used to select silicone polymers best suited for co-deployment studies with LDPE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006 two 3-week sampling events were added in the spring prior to the beginning of the dry season. At each site five SPMDs were loaded into a stainless steel cage and suspended 3 meters above the river bottom with an anchor-cage-float system described elsewhere (19). The five SPMDs from each site were extracted together as one sample to increase detection capabilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%