2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal change and determinants of maternal reproductive success in an expanding oak forest stand

Abstract: Summary1. Global change is generating widespread local-scale expansions of tree populations. During demographic expansions, even small differences in individual reproductive success can generate large differences in the genetic composition of the resulting population. Colonizing tree populations almost invariably show highly skewed distributions of seed production, but the evolution of this reproductive skew during plant recruitment remains understudied. 2. We examine how recruit mortality modifies initial pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, the hypothesis that fecundity is greater for bigger individuals should be rejected (see also [8,36]). Models based on tree size (basal area and tree height) to estimate fecundity were rejected for their performance being smaller than the null model.…”
Section: Fecundity Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our results, the hypothesis that fecundity is greater for bigger individuals should be rejected (see also [8,36]). Models based on tree size (basal area and tree height) to estimate fecundity were rejected for their performance being smaller than the null model.…”
Section: Fecundity Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Fecundity variation among adults will determine the population´s effective size or the within-population spatial genetic structure [7,8]. In addition, depending on pollen flow dynamics, unequal fecundity across adults may likely lead to biparental inbreeding and to a higher risk of random allele fixation and genetic drift that will shape the within-population genetic diversity and its adaptive potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stands are largely exempt from forest management. Many are actively expanding (Gerzabek et al, 2017), favoured by a recent change in silvicultural management that tends to conserve broadleaved trees recruiting within adjacent pine plantations as a mean of conservation biological control (Castagneyrol et al, 2014;Dulaurent et al, 2011).…”
Section: Study Area and Selection Of Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel native forest stands establish from a few founder trees that colonize an available habitat patch within an unsuitable matrix through long-distance dispersal and fill their neighbourhood with their offsprings (Gerzabek et al, 2017;Sezen et al, 2005). Such stands share certain characteristics that set them apart from those created by fragmentation: (i) they typically are quite small-sizedeven smaller than the smallest fragments of remnant forest; (ii) they are dominated by young trees, resulting in a reduced amount and range of habitats available to forest-dwelling species (Franklin, 1988;Fuller et al, 2018); and (iii) all their species necessarily originate from colonization events over a limited period of time, implying that these systems are triggered by immigration credit instead of extinction debt (Jackson and Sax, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). In this SF, three contributions relate to this aspect by (i) considering pollen dispersal as a vector of gene flow that comes in addition to seed migration (Klein, Lagache‐Navarro & Petit ; Robledo‐Arnuncio & Gaggiotti ) and (ii) deciphering how the local dispersal patterns determine the variance of reproductive success and the effective population size with regard to genetic drift (Gerzabek, Oddou‐Muratorio & Hampe ). Robledo‐Arnuncio & Gaggiotti (2017) and Gerzabek, Oddou‐Muratorio & Hampe (2017) both use molecular marker data to reconstruct dispersal events and raise conclusions about contemporary migration rates and/or dispersal kernels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%