Temporal changes of seismicity in Salton Sea Geothermal Field due to distant earthquakes and geothermal productions

Abstract

Summary The Salton Sea Geothermal Field (SSGF) is one of the most seismically active and geothermally productive fields in California. Here we present a detailed analysis of short-term seismicity change in SSGF from 2008 to 2013 during and right following large distant earthquakes, as well as long-term seismicity change due to geothermal productions. We first apply a GPU-based waveform matched-filter technique (WMFT) to the continuous data recorded by the Calenergy Borehole (EN) Network and detect more than 70 000 new microearthquakes than listed in the standard Southern California Seismic Network catalog. We then analyze the seismicity rate changes in the SSGF associated with transient stress fluctuations triggered by regional and large teleseismic earthquakes from 1999 to 2019. We find triggered seismicity in the SSGF following seven regional M > 5.5 earthquakes. In comparison, teleseismic earthquakes with M > 8.0 did not trigger significant seismicity rate change in the SSGF, likely indicating a frequency dependence in remote dynamic triggering. We further characterize the correlation between the long-term seismicity rate and geothermal production rates, and the temporal and spatial distribution of Guttenberg-Richter b-values inside and outside the SSGF with the newly detected catalog. The long-term seismicity shows that events with M > 1.5 are likely correlated with net production rates, while smaller events do not show any correlation. The b-values inside the SSGF are higher than those outside the SSGF, and the locations of dynamically triggered events are close to locations with high b-values.

Comparing Adjoint Waveform Tomography Models of California Using Different Starting Models

“…Despite the differences in the starting models, the final models resolve similar features in the upper crust (Figure 3). All three final models have low velocities along the western coast in the upper crust, corresponding (from North to South) to the Gorda slab window (Box 1, Figure 3e; Furlong & Schwartz, 2004), the Geysers geothermal field (Box 2, Figure 3e; Lin & Wu, 2018; Majer & McEvilly, 1979; Zucca et al., 1994), and the Central Valley sedimentary basin (Box 3, Figure 3d; Li et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2010). CANV_WUS, which starts with WUS256, has the lowest velocities and clearest definition between the Gorda slab window and the Geysers geothermal field.…”

Thousand‐Kilometer DAS Array Reveals an Uncatalogued Magnitude‐5 Dynamically Triggered Event After the 2023 Turkey Earthquake

“…Figure 7a shows that the static Coulomb stress change is 0.013 MPa. Next, the peak dynamic stress change ( σ ) is calculated based on the peak ground velocity (PGV): $$$\sigma =\frac{\mu \,(\text{PGV})}{c}$$$ where μ is the shear modulus assigned as 35 GPa in this study (C. Li et al., 2023), and c is phase velocity assigned as 3.5 km/s in this study. The PGV at the station nearest to the uncatalogued event (TK2411) is 11.356 cm/s.…”

Ubiquitous Earthquake Dynamic Triggering in Southern California

“…Dynamically triggered earthquakes are typically small (Hill & Prejean, 2015), and lower magnitudes of completeness permit the identification of more triggered cases (Li et al., 2022). We have tested the possibility by using the QTM‐9.5 catalog, which has a lower M c than the QTM‐12 catalog.…”