1982
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90087-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal contrast sensitivity and cortical magnification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
2
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
52
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the normal adult visual system, contrast sensitivity to a moving bar is maximized at p ≈ 3 deg/s for a bar width of 1 degree, but this increases to p ≈ 10 deg/s for a width of 3 degrees [10]. For low spatial frequency gratings (0.75 cyc/deg), [11] reported a considerable increase in p with foveal eccentricity from˜8 deg/s at the fovea to˜20 deg/s at 7.5 deg. Thus, substantial values for p are not improbable, but it is difficult to 'guesstimate' p for an abnormal visual system (and in infancy!).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the normal adult visual system, contrast sensitivity to a moving bar is maximized at p ≈ 3 deg/s for a bar width of 1 degree, but this increases to p ≈ 10 deg/s for a width of 3 degrees [10]. For low spatial frequency gratings (0.75 cyc/deg), [11] reported a considerable increase in p with foveal eccentricity from˜8 deg/s at the fovea to˜20 deg/s at 7.5 deg. Thus, substantial values for p are not improbable, but it is difficult to 'guesstimate' p for an abnormal visual system (and in infancy!).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychophysics has demonstrated that sensitivity to a spatial frequency is maximal at some non-zero image speed, where the optimal speed varies inversely with spatial frequency. Thus, high spatial frequencies (as mediated via the central retina) require very low drift speeds, whereas low spatial frequencies require more moderate speeds to induce maximal visual contrast [10][11][12].…”
Section: Non-veridical Velocity Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 The tCSF decreases globally with increasing eccentricity, although again the maximum does not change its position. 76 However, unlike visual acuity, higher CFF values are found outside the fovea at scotopic levels. 77 …”
Section: Spatial Frequency (Cpd) Visual Eccentricity (Deg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eccentricity increases (Figure 20, centre), but all curves collapse to a single one if velocity is measured in mm of cortex per second instead of degrees per second (Figure 20, right). 76 It follows, therefore, that the visual cortex is not just spatially homogeneous, but is also homogeneous in the spatio-temporal domain: a single spatio-temporal CSF characterizes the behaviour of the whole cortex.…”
Section: Figure 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because the spatial summation process that enhances peripheral contrast sensitivity at the cost of spatial resolution (Green, 1970;Thibos, Cheney, & Walsh, 1987;Virsu, Rovamo, Laurinen, & Näsänen, 1982;Wang et al, 1997) is compromised by the increase in temporal frequency of the stimulus. Because central vision does not rely on summation in the same way as peripheral vision, the effect of increasing temporal frequency is not as severe.…”
Section: Experiments 2: An Examination Of the Basis For The Reversal: mentioning
confidence: 99%