2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal, Cultural and Thematic Aspects of Web Credibility

Abstract: Abstract. Is trust to web pages related to nation-level factors? Do trust levels change in time and how? What categories (topics) of pages tend to be evaluated as not trustworthy, and what categories of pages tend to be trustworthy? What could be the reasons of such evaluations? The goal of this paper is to answer these questions using large scale data of trustworthiness of web pages, two sets of websites, Wikipedia and an international survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, some topics may be generally more trustworthy than others. These considerations, confirmed recently in [12], point to the possibility that bag-of-word representation could indeed be aligned with topic-based classification. However, the verification of this hypothesis falls out of the immediate scope of this paper and may need more robust data sets with topic labels assignment.…”
Section: Words Of High and Low Trustmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In other words, some topics may be generally more trustworthy than others. These considerations, confirmed recently in [12], point to the possibility that bag-of-word representation could indeed be aligned with topic-based classification. However, the verification of this hypothesis falls out of the immediate scope of this paper and may need more robust data sets with topic labels assignment.…”
Section: Words Of High and Low Trustmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…One of the major objectives of this article is to determine how the specific background of users (demographic, sociological, or psychological profile, as well as topic of content) may affect final classifications based on evaluations uploaded by random and relatively small groups of system participants. As described by Rafalak et al [2014b], Wawer et al [2014], and Nielek et al [2013], psychosocial determinants play an important role in predicting evaluations in crowdsourcing systems dedicated to website trustworthiness. In order to explore how extreme cases affect evaluations uploaded to a quality evaluation system, for every value of an independent variable included in the analyzed datasets, random samples of size 10 are drawn (for example, for the gender variable, we draw samples of size 10 of evaluations submitted only by men and samples submitted only by women).…”
Section: Methods For Evaluating the Sensitivity Of The Sample Structurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively they represent characteristics of the authority, source, and message (Rieh & Danielson, 2007). Further, literature suggests that credibility is a subjective perception and the information user perspective has to be taken into consideration (Metzger & Flanagin, 2015;Nielek et al, 2013). The understanding, experience, values, attitudes, culture and other characteristics of the user are crucial for the interpretation of facts.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Credibility In Information Science: Mapping Thmentioning
confidence: 99%