2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.15.20066746
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal detection and phylogenetic assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal wastewater

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 has recently been detected in feces, which indicates that wastewater may be used to monitor viral prevalence in the community. Here we use RT-qPCR to monitor wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 RNA over a 52-day time course. We show that changes in SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations correlate with local COVID-19 epidemiological data (R2=0.9), though detection in wastewater trails symptom onset dates by 5-8 days. We determine a near-complete (98.5%) SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence from the wastewater and use phy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

14
205
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
14
205
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the increase in case counts may occur concurrently with or even precede the increase in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, while the decline in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater may lag the decline in case counts. This temporal variation in RNA in wastewater versus case counts has been suggested by others 24,25,28,34 . Further, the long term shedding of the SARS-CoV-2 after negative nasopharyngeal swabs may account for the detection of RNA in wastewater after the decline in case counts 35 .…”
Section: Virus Rna Detection Frequency and Correlation With Covid-19 supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the increase in case counts may occur concurrently with or even precede the increase in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, while the decline in SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater may lag the decline in case counts. This temporal variation in RNA in wastewater versus case counts has been suggested by others 24,25,28,34 . Further, the long term shedding of the SARS-CoV-2 after negative nasopharyngeal swabs may account for the detection of RNA in wastewater after the decline in case counts 35 .…”
Section: Virus Rna Detection Frequency and Correlation With Covid-19 supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in France were sampled over a 7-week period and reported data that correlated with the country's nationwide lockdown 24 . Attempts to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater were also successful in Italy 25,26 , the Netherlands 27 and the United States 28,29 , and in some cases were shown to correlate with COVID-19 case counts. The maximum SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations reported in wastewater influent ranged from 1.2x10 3 to 3.2x10 6 gene copies/L in wastewater influent 23,24,25,26,28,29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…viral RNA yield for sequencing 29 animals such rabbits, minks, cats and ferrets [31][32][33][34][35] . The analysis of a consensus sequence genome from a wastewater sample may identify the predominant virus strain present in a population, which might be suitable for locations where only 1 or few introductions of closely related viruses have occurred, as it seems to be the case for 2 previous studies in Italy and USA 23,24 . Nonetheless, the consensus genome approach cannot reflect the diversity of the viruses circulating in a population with a high degree of viral diversity.…”
Section: Presence Of Specific Lfvs May Be Associated To the Presence mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the presence in wastewater of several viruses [41][42][43][44][45] . Processes to monitor SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater were first developed in the Netherlands 35 , followed by the USA 46 , France 39 , Australia 36 , Italy 47 and Spain 37,48 . In the Netherlands, no viral RNA was detected 3 weeks before the first case was reported, but genetic material started to appear over time, as the number of cases of COVID-19 increased 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, nonparametric and even simple parametric regression models have been shown to be useful tools to construct prediction models for the real number of COVID-19 active cases as a function of the viral load. This is a pioneering approach in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic since, to our knowledge, WBE studies available are still limited to reporting the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in WWTPs and sewer networks, in order to establish a direct comparison with declared COVID-19 cases35,37,[46][47][48] . The only precedent52 combines computational analysis and modelling with a theoretical approach in order to identify useful variables and confirm the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of WBE as a prediction tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%