2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Development of Quality of Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the average of all individual stimulus judgments as a basis (resulting in a correlation using Pearson's R of around 0.90), the prediction performance could be improved to around 0.98 by including a recency effect and a model of individual strongly negative ratings. Similar results were obtained for video telephony [3], increasing the correlation from 0.93 for the plain average to approx. 0.97 for models including recency and strongly negative samples effects.…”
Section: Motivation and Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking the average of all individual stimulus judgments as a basis (resulting in a correlation using Pearson's R of around 0.90), the prediction performance could be improved to around 0.98 by including a recency effect and a model of individual strongly negative ratings. Similar results were obtained for video telephony [3], increasing the correlation from 0.93 for the plain average to approx. 0.97 for models including recency and strongly negative samples effects.…”
Section: Motivation and Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…one telephone call or one movie), several cognitive effects have been observed, see e.g. [3,4,5] for an overview. Typically, averaging of the quality judgments of all segments of an episodic stimulus only explains part of the variance of the episodic judgments.…”
Section: Motivation and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This session-based QoE allows to derive long-term QoE fairness. There are also attempts to capture instantaneous QoE [11] which allows to derive short-term QoE and consequently short-term QoE fairness. In a system with several users, the set of observed QoS parameters over all users (in the steady state or the transient phase) is a random variable (RV) X, which means that after the mapping the QoE value Y is also a RV.…”
Section: Definition Of the Qoe Fairness Index A Notionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, Free Use experiment, this relationship was not found, whereas (1) a decrease in the amount of interaction as well as (2) a negative correlation of QoE with buffering events length was found. The reasons for this disExperiencing Live Events TVX 2015, June 3-5, 2015, Brussels, Belgium crepancy may be diverse, and possibly touch upon problems related to long-term usage of applications and services [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%