2003
DOI: 10.1375/136905203765693834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Differences in the Regional Twinning Rates in Sweden after 1750

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure confirms that the high TWR in Gotland (21.67 per 1,000) is an outlier. This finding supports our earlier results that the TWR values for Gotland are continuously quite high (Fellman & Eriksson, 2003, 2005, 2009). Among the other counties, no outliers were found.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This figure confirms that the high TWR in Gotland (21.67 per 1,000) is an outlier. This finding supports our earlier results that the TWR values for Gotland are continuously quite high (Fellman & Eriksson, 2003, 2005, 2009). Among the other counties, no outliers were found.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The TWR of the county of Gotland is so extreme that it can be considered an outlier. These regional variations support the findings in Fellman and Eriksson (2003, 2005, 2009). Spatial models for TWR and especially for SR yield rather poor fit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As examples of these factors, maternal age and birth order may be indicated (Fellman & Eriksson, 1987). However, according to Eriksson et al (1995), Eriksson and Fellman (2004), and Fellman and Eriksson (2003), such variability cannot be explained satisfactorily. Other demographic variables, including increasing population movements and urbanization processes, should be taken into account (Eriksson & Fellman, 2004; Fellman & Eriksson, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we consider isolates in Finland (Åland Islands), Sweden (island of Gotland and county of Älvsborg), and Norway (mountain villages). The Finnish study is based on Eriksson (1973), the Swedish study on Fellman and Eriksson (2003, 2005b, 2009), and the Norwegian study on Bonnevie and Sverdrup (1926). In our statistical analyses, we paid special attention to: (a) the robustness of the variance formula of the TWR, and (b) the most precise confidence intervals for the TWRs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%