2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal dynamics of soil moisture in a northern temperate mixed successional forest after a prescribed intermediate disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is most likely that the larger discrepancy between E C and LE in the treatment plot was related to increased understory transpiration, due to increased light penetration through the more open canopy that characterizes the disturbed plot . In their study of soil moisture in these same plots, He et al [2013] similarly found ET to be lower in the treatment plot, but that enhanced soil evaporation was not sufficient to completely offset the difference in total LE. Between the two plots, there were relatively small differences in atmospheric conditions (VPD, temperature, and pressure) such that, in accordance with our g sj -g sj ′ analysis,~7-19% of the differences in water flux between plots could be attributed to the differences in forcing.…”
Section: Red Oakmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is most likely that the larger discrepancy between E C and LE in the treatment plot was related to increased understory transpiration, due to increased light penetration through the more open canopy that characterizes the disturbed plot . In their study of soil moisture in these same plots, He et al [2013] similarly found ET to be lower in the treatment plot, but that enhanced soil evaporation was not sufficient to completely offset the difference in total LE. Between the two plots, there were relatively small differences in atmospheric conditions (VPD, temperature, and pressure) such that, in accordance with our g sj -g sj ′ analysis,~7-19% of the differences in water flux between plots could be attributed to the differences in forcing.…”
Section: Red Oakmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Between the two plots, there were relatively small differences in atmospheric conditions (VPD, temperature, and pressure) such that, in accordance with our g sj -g sj ′ analysis,~7-19% of the differences in water flux between plots could be attributed to the differences in forcing. He et al [2013] found that canopy interception typically accounted for~11-25% and up to 31% of precipitation in our plots with reduced interception in the disturbance plot. It is unlikely that the lower treatment plot E C could be the outcome of biased species representation among the instrumented trees.…”
Section: Red Oakmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil moisture and temperature were recorded at four locations at depths of 5, 15, 30, and 60 cm, and at two locations at depths of 100, 200, and 300 cm (Hydra probe SDI-12; Stevens Water Monitoring Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA; He et al 2013). Soil moisture values in each measurement depth were averaged (two to four measurements, depending on depth).…”
Section: Soil Water Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because soil moisture at each depth was highly correlated with soil moisture at all other depths, we integrated soil moisture along the 3 m soil column. Soil moisture measurements were converted to soil water potential values (W, MPa) using the Van Genuchten hydraulic parameterization (Van Genuchten 1980) with site specific parameters developed for our site by He et al (2013) and (Matheny et al 2014b). …”
Section: Soil Water Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%