2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1055-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal genetic dynamics among mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) populations in invaded watersheds

Abstract: SummaryThe temporal components of genetic diversity and geographical structure of invasive mosquitofish populations are poorly known. Through the genetic monitoring of four consecutive cohorts of Gambusia holbrooki from three different river basins we aimed to determine temporal patterns of regional genetic variation and dispersal rates within invasive populations. Despite showing evidence of strong population size fluctuations, genetic diversity levels were maintained among local cohorts. We only detected tem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our discussion is focused on broad scale clustering results (K = 8), an AMOVA suggests significant population structure between regions (Central America, Bahamas, South Florida, West Florida, East Florida), populations within regions, sampling locations within populations, individuals within sampling locations, and within individuals ( Table 1 ). Strong population structure is common in intertidal fish ( Díez-del-Molino et al, 2016 ; Hurt et al, 2017 ; Xie et al, 2022 ) and species occupying highly fragmented landscapes ( Browne et al, 2015 ; Wultsch et al, 2016 ). We also expect strong population structure in mixed-mating species ( Mori et al, 2015 ), those that can outcross or self-fertilize, with more structure emerging as outcrossing rates decrease ( Duminil, et al, 2007 ; Hodgins and Yeaman, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our discussion is focused on broad scale clustering results (K = 8), an AMOVA suggests significant population structure between regions (Central America, Bahamas, South Florida, West Florida, East Florida), populations within regions, sampling locations within populations, individuals within sampling locations, and within individuals ( Table 1 ). Strong population structure is common in intertidal fish ( Díez-del-Molino et al, 2016 ; Hurt et al, 2017 ; Xie et al, 2022 ) and species occupying highly fragmented landscapes ( Browne et al, 2015 ; Wultsch et al, 2016 ). We also expect strong population structure in mixed-mating species ( Mori et al, 2015 ), those that can outcross or self-fertilize, with more structure emerging as outcrossing rates decrease ( Duminil, et al, 2007 ; Hodgins and Yeaman, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Led by Love Dalén, David Diezdel-Molino and colleagues compared the genome of the early mammoth to the ones from the last 100,000 years, where more abundant genomic information is available, as well as to those of Asian elephants [4] . They discovered numerous genetic dispositions that can plausibly be connected to the adaptation to Arctic conditions.…”
Section: 6bnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KRT77 is a member of the keratin gene family responsible for the structural integrity of cells in the epithelium and hair follicles. Mutations in keratin genes are linked to curly-hair phenotype in other dogs, rats, and mice (31), and to woolly hair and hereditary hair loss in humans (26,30); and multiple KRT genes underwent selection in woolly mammoths (25). CERS3, PRDM5, and HAPLN1 are associated with maintaining the integrity of the skin or connective tissue in humans (27,28).…”
Section: The Influence Of People On the Woolly Dog Genomementioning
confidence: 99%