2003
DOI: 10.2307/3803065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Habitat Partitioning and Spatial Use of Coyotes and Red Foxes in East-Central Illinois

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
170
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
11
170
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All prey items are in high abundance in the northeastern United States and therefore are preferred by and available to coyotes. Voles and rabbits are also seen in the winter diet of northeastern coyotes [51]. Our results support that idea as well as show insight in to how coyotes are preying on these species.…”
Section: L Metzger Et Alsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…All prey items are in high abundance in the northeastern United States and therefore are preferred by and available to coyotes. Voles and rabbits are also seen in the winter diet of northeastern coyotes [51]. Our results support that idea as well as show insight in to how coyotes are preying on these species.…”
Section: L Metzger Et Alsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our study area in Central Europe differs from areas in moderate (Gosselink et al 2003, Switalski 2003 or boreal zones (Elmhagen et al 2002, Helldin andDanielsson 2007) or southern latitudes (Stuart and Stuart 2003, Giannatos 2004, Scheinin et al 2006 when larger predators entered a Carnivora community. Specifically, the diet compositions and consequently food preferences of the competitors rarely differed, and when it did it occurred only over a short period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a temperate agricultural zone of North America, when the grey wolf (Switalski 2003) or the coyote (Canis latrans) (Crooks and Soulé 1999, Gosselink et al 2003, Kamler et al 2003 appeared, they had a significant negative effect on the abundance of smaller carnivores (such as domestic cat Felis catus, red fox, swift fox Vulpes velox). Consequently, smaller carnivores had a lower impact on, e.g., bird populations (Crooks and Soulé 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of studies of red foxes in landscapes similar to modern-day Sacramento Valley, we anticipated that proximity to human development conferred protection against coyotes (Dekker 1983;Sargeant et al 1987;Sargeant and Allen 1989;Gosselink et al 2003). We used ArcGIS (v10.0; Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) to project locations of red fox den sites, road kills, and 34,500 randomly generated points (i.e., a density of~three points per square kilometer) and coded them with respect to the three explanatory variables: 1) vegetation class, 2) distance to grasslands (DistGrass), and 3) distance to development (DistDev).…”
Section: Data Coding In Gismentioning
confidence: 99%