2022
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Modulation Transfer Functions of Amplitude-Modulated Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Young Adults

Abstract: Objectives: Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are widely used to evaluate saccular function in clinical and research applications. Typically, transient tonebursts are used to elicit cVEMPs. In this study, we used bone-conducted amplitude-modulated (AM) tones to elicit AMcVEMPs. This new approach allows the examination of phase-locked vestibular responses across a range of modulation frequencies. Currently, cVEMP temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) are not well defined. The purp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, bone-conducted FFRs have been recorded in profoundly deaf listeners, suggesting non-auditory pathways of response generation (Ribarić et al, 1984 ). These might include direct or indirect contributions from the vestibular system [e.g., evoked myogenic potentials (Ribarić et al, 1984 ; Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996 ; Lawlor et al, 2022 )] and/or somatosensory contributions near the electrode-skin interface that can persist up to rates of 287 (Lawlor et al, 2022 ) and 130 Hz (Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996 ), respectively. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, our data clearly demonstrate physiological noise outside the auditory system easily conflates neurogenic FFR signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, bone-conducted FFRs have been recorded in profoundly deaf listeners, suggesting non-auditory pathways of response generation (Ribarić et al, 1984 ). These might include direct or indirect contributions from the vestibular system [e.g., evoked myogenic potentials (Ribarić et al, 1984 ; Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996 ; Lawlor et al, 2022 )] and/or somatosensory contributions near the electrode-skin interface that can persist up to rates of 287 (Lawlor et al, 2022 ) and 130 Hz (Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996 ), respectively. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, our data clearly demonstrate physiological noise outside the auditory system easily conflates neurogenic FFR signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, bone-conducted FFRs have been recorded in profoundly deaf listeners suggesting nonauditory pathways of response generation (Ribarić et al, 1984). These might include direct or indirect contributions from the vestibular system [e.g., evoked myogenic potentials (Ribarić et al, 1984;Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996;Lawlor et al, 2022)] and/or somatosensory contributions near the electrode-skin interface which can persist up to rates of 287 (Lawlor et al, 2022) and 130 Hz (Prevec and Ribarić-Jankes, 1996), respectively. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, our data clearly demonstrate physiological noise outside the auditory system easily conflates neurogenic FFR signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%