The composition of planktonic eukaryotes in the size fraction 3-20 µm of 10 maritime Antarctic lakes was studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Microscopic observations were also carried out to compare the results obtained by this molecular fingerprinting technique with morphological data. Six lakes from Hope Bay (Antarctic Peninsula) and 4 from the Potter Peninsula (King George Island) were sampled during the austral summer of 2003. These lakes were of different trophic status and covered a wide range of limnological features. Previous studies of the planktonic communities of these lakes revealed high nanoflagellate abundance and biomass, but their taxonomic identification was usually uncertain due to their similarity in size and shape. Here, the application of DGGE allowed both a comparison of the structure of the nanoplanktonic communities and an identification of the dominant populations through sequencing of the most prominent DGGE bands. The most important organisms in these lakes were the Chrysophyceae, represented in the DGGE gel by 5 different band positions and identified by microscopy in 5 different morphotypes, including uniflagellated and biflagellated naked organisms: 1 sequence belonged to the Chrysosphaerales, 2 closely related bands (likely 2 species from the same genus) belonged probably to the Ochromonadales (unicellular biflagellates), while the other 2 bands could not be assigned to any defined chrysophyte group. Sequences related to Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae and probably Cercozoa were also retrieved. A Dictyochophyceae belonging to the order Pedinellales is reported for the first time in freshwater Antarctic ecosystems. Microscopic observations suggest that this phytoplanktonic organism most likely corresponds to Pseudopedinella. Most of the lakes shared several common sequences, such as 2 chrysophyte bands, which suggests the existence of well-adapted nanoplanktonic species dispersed throughout the Antarctic lakes. However, some sequences appeared exclusively in specific lakes, which seems to be related to the trophic status of the water bodies and probably also to the local conditions of the maritime Antarctic regions sampled.
KEY WORDS: Freshwater nanoplankton · Antarctic lakes · DGGE · 18S rDNAResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Aquat Microb Ecol 40: 269-282, 2005 Signy Island, this fraction contributes between 49 and 69% of carbon fixation (Ellis-Evans 1991). In addition, bacterivory by heterotrophic nanoflagellates may remove between 0.1 and 32% of the bacterial production per day (Laybourn-Parry et al. 1995, Bell & LaybournParry 2003, while mixotrophic nanoplanktonic algae are able to remove up to 16% of the bacterial biomass, equivalent to >100% of in situ bacterial production (Bell & Laybourn-Parry 2003).Flagellated algae dominate the nanoplanktonic fraction of the phytoplankton community in Hope Bay lakes (Antarctic Peninsula) (Izaguirre et al. 1993, 2003. In particular, Chrysophyceae dominate algal...