2017
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1700210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal population genetic structure in the pollen pool for flowering time: A field experiment with Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae)

Abstract: Temporal genetic structure, especially for flowering time, likely occurs in many plant populations and may be underestimated using a prospective method. We discuss the genome-wide consequences of temporal genetic structure and the potential for adaptive temporal clines in plant populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of these mechanisms provide unsatisfactory explanations for the observed patterns of reproduction in Echinacea and potentially other pollen-limited plants (Wagenius 2006, Ison andWagenius 2014). The changes in pollinator service that we observed across one season support the hypothesis that pollinators mediate seasonal declines in reproductive success in Echinacea (Ison and Wagenius 2014), which has strong implications for selection and temporal assortative mating Kossler 2004, Ison andWeis 2017). The overall observed bee community composition, dominant taxa, and changes over time are consistent with observations in the same study area over two years (Wagenius and Lyon 2010).…”
Section: Implications Selection On Phenological Traits and Populationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many of these mechanisms provide unsatisfactory explanations for the observed patterns of reproduction in Echinacea and potentially other pollen-limited plants (Wagenius 2006, Ison andWagenius 2014). The changes in pollinator service that we observed across one season support the hypothesis that pollinators mediate seasonal declines in reproductive success in Echinacea (Ison and Wagenius 2014), which has strong implications for selection and temporal assortative mating Kossler 2004, Ison andWeis 2017). The overall observed bee community composition, dominant taxa, and changes over time are consistent with observations in the same study area over two years (Wagenius and Lyon 2010).…”
Section: Implications Selection On Phenological Traits and Populationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For example, nearby individuals or populations exchange alleles more often than distant individuals or populations, and individuals with overlapping mating periods are more likely to mate than asynchronous individuals. Mating patterns that change over a season are prevalent in insects (Rowe andLudwig 1991, Robinet et al 2008), salmon (Morbey andYdenberg 2003, Hendry et al 2004), birds (Rowe et al 1994, Kaiser et al 2017, and are particularly common in plants (Augspurger 1981, Schmitt 1983, Kitamoto et al 2006, Ison and Weis 2017. Mating between plants may be limited if timing of flowering among individuals does not overlap or if timing mismatches with pollinators (Augspurger 1981, Price and Waser 1998, Forrest 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in reproductive phenology is widely observed, and many studies have found a genetic component to flowering time (e.g., Best and McIntyre, 1972; Mazer, 1987; Andersson, 1996; O'Neil, 1997; Weis and Kossler, 2004; Franks et al, 2007). In a study of the annual plant species, Plectritis congesta , heritability of flowering time estimated in selfed and outcrossed natural populations ranged from 0.42 to 0.72 (Carey, 1983), while for open‐pollinated experimental plots of the annual species Brassica rapa heritability estimates ranged from 0.51 to 0.67 (Austen and Weis, 2016; Ison and Weis, 2017). Studies of inbred accessions of annual plant species have demonstrated that numerous genes influence the date of flowering onset (maize, Buckler et al, 2009; Arabidopsis thaliana , Wilczek et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over extended periods, assortative mating influences the evolution of genetic variance in populations (Godineau et al, 2022 and references therein) and can result in reproductive isolation of subpopulations by time. This isolation can create or exacerbate temporal genetic structure via limited gene transfer among subpopulations differing in reproductive phenology (Hendry and Day, 2005; Daïnou et al, 2012; Ison and Weis, 2017). The severity of isolation by time and temporal genetic structure within a population will depend heavily on the degree to which variation in parental phenotypes is heritable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call this ‘isolation by phenology’ (IBP). Most populations harbour quantitative genetic variation for flowering phenology (Geber & Griffen, ), and so allele frequencies at phenology loci shift across successive mating pools: ‘early’ alleles predominate as the season starts and ‘late’ alleles as it ends (Ison & Weis, ). One consequence of phenological isolation is that uniting gametes tend to carry alleles of similar effect across the phenology loci (Weis et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%