2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.040701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal power reconstruction for an x-ray free-electron laser using convolutional neural networks

Abstract: The free-electron laser process extracts energy from a relativistic electron beam to create high-power, coherent x-ray radiation. The energy loss leaves an imprint of the radiation on the longitudinal energy-time phase-space of the electron beam. At the Linac Coherent Light Source, the X-band transverse deflecting mode cavity measures the longitudinal phase-space, and an x-ray temporal power profile is predicted according to time slices difference between lasing-off and lasing-on measurements. However, the alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural networks are trained using the minibatch stochastic gradient decent optimization algorithm [13] driven by a loss function. For most regression problems, the choice of the loss function defaults to the mean squared error (MSE) [4][5][6]17]. However, a MSE loss function treats pixels as uncorrelated features and is found to result in overly smoothed images and loss of high-frequency features in high-resolution image-generation applications [21].…”
Section: B Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neural networks are trained using the minibatch stochastic gradient decent optimization algorithm [13] driven by a loss function. For most regression problems, the choice of the loss function defaults to the mean squared error (MSE) [4][5][6]17]. However, a MSE loss function treats pixels as uncorrelated features and is found to result in overly smoothed images and loss of high-frequency features in high-resolution image-generation applications [21].…”
Section: B Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of large-scale scientific user facilities such as the European XFEL [1] is very challenging, as it is necessary to meet the specifications of various user experiments [2] and to be capable of switching the machine status rapidly. Machine learning, especially deep learning, has provided powerful tools for accelerator physicists to build fast-prediction surrogate models [3][4][5] and to extract essential information [6][7][8] from large amounts of data in recent years. These machine-learning models can be extremely useful for building virtual accelerators, which are capable of making fast predictions of the behavior of beams [9], assisting accelerator tuning by virtually bringing destructive diagnostics online [4], providing an initial guess of input parameters for model-independent adaptive feedback control algorithms [10,11], and driving modelbased feedback control algorithms [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a few concrete examples, various ML methods have now been demonstrated for a wide range of systems such as molecular and materials science studies 3 , for use in optical communications and photonics 4 , to accurately predict battery life 5 , to accelerate lattice Monte Carlo simulations using neural networks 6 , for studying complex networks 7 , for characterizing surface microstructure of complex materials 8 , for chemical discovery 9 , for noninvasive identification of Hypotension using convolutional-deconvolutional networks 10 , for active matter analysis by using deep neural networks to track objects 11 , for imputation of missing physiological waveform data by using convolutional autoencoders 12 , for optimizing operational problems in hospitals 13 , for cardiovascular disease risk prediction 14 , for particle physics 15 , for antimicrobial studies 16 , for pattern recognition for optical microscopy images of metallurgical microstructures 17 , for learning Perovskit bandgaps 18 , for real-time mapping of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) patterns to crystal orientations 19 , for speeding up simulation-based accelerator optimization studies 20 , for Bayesian optimization of free electron lasers (FEL) 21 , for temporal power reconstruction of FELs 22 , for various applications at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN including optics corrections and detecting faulty beam position monitors [23][24][25][26] , for reconstruction of a storage ring's linear optics based on Bayesian inference 27 , to analyze beam position monitor placement in accelerators to find arrangements with the lowest probable predictive errors based on Bayesian Gaussian regression 28 , for temporal shaping of electron bunches in particle accelerators 29 , for stabilization of source properties in synchrotron light sources 30 , and to represent many-body interactions with restricted-Boltzmann-machine neural networks 31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a few concrete examples, various ML methods have now been demonstrated for a wide range of systems such as molecular and materials science studies 3 , for use in optical communications and photonics 4 , to accurately predict battery life 5 , to accelerate lattice Monte Carlo simulations using neural networks 6 , for studying complex networks 7 , for characterizing surface microstructure of complex materials 8 , for chemical discovery 9 , for noninvasive identification of Hypotension using convolutional-deconvolutional networks 10 , for active matter analysis by using deep neural networks to track objects 11 , for imputation of missing physiological waveform data by using convolutional autoencoders 12 , for optimizing operational problems in hospitals 13 , for cardiovascular disease risk prediction 14 , for particle physics 15 , for antimicrobial studies 16 , for pattern recognition for optical microscopy images of metallurgical microstructures 17 , for learning Perovskit bandgaps 18 , for real-time mapping of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) patterns to crystal orientations 19 , for speeding up simulation-based accelerator optimization studies 20 , for Bayesian optimization of free electron lasers (FEL) 21 , for temporal power reconstruction of FELs 22 , for various applications at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN including optics corrections and detecting faulty beam position monitors 23 – 26 , for reconstruction of a storage ring’s linear optics based on Bayesian inference 27 , to analyze beam position monitor placement in accelerators to find arrangements with the lowest probable predictive errors based on Bayesian Gaussian regression 28 , for temporal shaping of electron bunches in particle accelerators 29 , for stabilization of source properties in synchrotron light sources 30 , and to represent many-body interactions with restricted-Boltzmann-machine neural networks 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%