2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-020-01502-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal prediction modeling for rainfall-induced shallow landslide hazards using extreme value distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An indirect approach based on the frequency of landslide-triggering events (i.e., earthquake or rainfall events) is, therefore, proposed. In this approach, recognizing that landslides are mainly caused by rainfall events, the temporal probability of such rainfall events is adopted as the temporal probability of landslide occurrence [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. A rainfall threshold for landslide occurrence is determined and then historical rainfall data are analyzed to derive the probability that the rainfall threshold will be exceeded by a certain rainfall event (the exceedance probability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An indirect approach based on the frequency of landslide-triggering events (i.e., earthquake or rainfall events) is, therefore, proposed. In this approach, recognizing that landslides are mainly caused by rainfall events, the temporal probability of such rainfall events is adopted as the temporal probability of landslide occurrence [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. A rainfall threshold for landslide occurrence is determined and then historical rainfall data are analyzed to derive the probability that the rainfall threshold will be exceeded by a certain rainfall event (the exceedance probability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rainfall threshold for landslide occurrence is determined and then historical rainfall data are analyzed to derive the probability that the rainfall threshold will be exceeded by a certain rainfall event (the exceedance probability). The rainfall exceedance probability is observed as an effective surrogate for temporal landslide probability [37,42,43,45,46,48]. The advantages of this approach are that a complete multitemporal inventory is not required and that temporal probability can be estimated wherever historical rainfall records, which can be easily obtained from rainfall gauges, are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system uses daily rainfall data, rainfall threshold methods and regional slope stability model based on instantaneous rainfall infiltration and grids to predict the occurrence of landslides. Lee Jung Hyun [8] used the Gumbel model to estimate the probability in exceeding the rainfall threshold, and combined the time probability of landslide occurrence with landslide sensitivity result of multi-layer perceptron model to estimate the risk of landslides at different time periods in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few attempts have been performed to exploit the possibility of using data-driven techniques which integrate static predisposing and dynamic triggering factors (Wang and Sassa 2006;Lee et al 2020;Lombardo et al 2014Lombardo et al , 2020. These approaches aimed to fill the intrinsic gaps of rainfall thresholds and physically based models, especially to: (i) take into account both predisposing geomorphological, geological, and hydrological features and rainfall triggering factors; (ii) be effective at local and regional scales; and (iii) represent the variation of unstable areas in time during a particular rainfall event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these approaches insert parameters of a rainfall event, collected through rain gauges or radar instruments, within the set of predictors of a data-driven algorithm to model the probability of occurrence of the triggered slope instabilities (Dai and Lee 2003;Ayalew and Yamagishi 2005;Wang and Sassa 2006;Chang et al 2008;Chang and Chiang 2009;Capecchi et al 2015;Lee et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%