2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between the current SOA and validity, F(1, 42) 0 15.61, pB.001, g 2 p ¼ :27, revealed that the validity effect was present only for the short SOA, F(1, 42) 033.06, pB.001, g 2 p ¼ :44, and not for the long SOA, F(1, 42) 01.08, p 0.305, g 2 p ¼ :02. This is the usually observed pattern of results (see, e.g., Correa et al, 2006Correa et al, , 2010. A significant main effect of previous SOA, F(1, 42) 045.52, p B.001, g 2 p ¼ :50, indicated slower RT on trials preceded by long SOA trials (320 ms) than on trials that were preceded by short SOA trials (301 ms).…”
Section: Temporal Orienting Tasksupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction between the current SOA and validity, F(1, 42) 0 15.61, pB.001, g 2 p ¼ :27, revealed that the validity effect was present only for the short SOA, F(1, 42) 033.06, pB.001, g 2 p ¼ :44, and not for the long SOA, F(1, 42) 01.08, p 0.305, g 2 p ¼ :02. This is the usually observed pattern of results (see, e.g., Correa et al, 2006Correa et al, , 2010. A significant main effect of previous SOA, F(1, 42) 045.52, p B.001, g 2 p ¼ :50, indicated slower RT on trials preceded by long SOA trials (320 ms) than on trials that were preceded by short SOA trials (301 ms).…”
Section: Temporal Orienting Tasksupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Specifically, in the short SOA condition, a typically reported validity effect was observed: responses were slower in the invalid cue condition than in the valid cue condition (cf. Correa et al, 2004Correa et al, , 2006Correa et al, , 2010. Moreover, we observed a sequential effect indexed by slower responses after long previous SOA intervals.…”
Section: Flexibility Of Temporal Preparationmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The authors of these studies suggested that this periodicity indicates that attention processes multiple stimuli sequentially, i.e., attention in these tasks is reoriented to different locations, following a low-frequency rhythm. To date, only one study [26] has explicitly manipulated covert attention to assess the behavioral periodicity of attentional sampling with a discrimination task; unfortunately, the main dependent variable was reaction time, which can reflect perceptual processing speed, motor anticipation [30], and criterion [17]. Moreover, although two studies have provided convincing evidence showing that two locations are sampled in alternation [24, 27], whether the periodicity is actually due to a sequential reallocation of attention or to the independent sampling of each location is still largely debated [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to stop an ongoing action quickly when it is no longer appropriate is an important part of the human executive control function [Logan and Cowan, ; Miyake and Friedman, ]. This ability may be significantly impaired with brain disorders and lesions that involve the frontal and basal ganglia system [Aron et al, ; Nachev et al, ; Sumner et al, ; Correa et al, ; Dalley et al, ; Smith et al, ; Sebastian et al, ; Benis et al, ]. Accumulating evidence indicates that such rapid stopping of an ongoing action relies on the fronto‐basal‐ganglia network, including the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) and the right presupplementary motor area (preSMA) [Miller and Cohen, ; Sumner et al, ; Chambers et al, ; Aron, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%