Temporal Relationships Between Individualism–Collectivism and the Economy in Soviet Russia

Abstract

Collectivism and individualism are commonly used to delineate societies that differ in their cultural values and patterns of social behaviour, prioritising the relative importance of the group and the individual, respectively. Collectivist and individualist expression is likely to be intricately linked with the political and economic history of a society. Scholars have proposed mechanisms for both positive and negative correlations between economic growth and a culture of either individualism or collectivism. Here, we consider these relationships across the dramatic history of twentieth and early twenty-first century Russia , spanning the late Russian Empire, the communist state and the growth of capitalism. We sample Russian speakers to identify common Russian words expressing individualism or collectivism, and examine the changing frequencies of these terms in Russian publications collected in Google's nGrams corpus. We correlate normalised individualism and collectivism expression against published estimates of economic growth (GDP and NMP) available between 1961-1995, finding high collectivist expression and economic growth rate followed by the correlated decline of both prior to the end of Soviet system. Temporal trends in the published expression of individualism and collectivism, in addition to their correlations with estimated economic growth rates, are examined in relation to the change in economic and political structures, ideology and public discourse.We also compare our sampled Russian-language terms for individualism and collectivism with Twenge et al.'s (2012) equivalent collection from American-English speakers.3

COVID‐19 shifts mortality salience, activities, and values in the United States: Big data analysis of online adaptation

“…Google's digitized collection of roughly 8 million books, 6% of the total books ever published, has been analyzed by numerous scholars to measure historical and cultural changes around the world (e.g., Campbell & Gentile, 2012; Greenfield, 2013; Michel et al, 2011; Skrebyte, Garnett, & Kendal, 2016; Twenge, Campbell, & Gentile, 2012; Zeng & Greenfield, 2015; Younes & Reips, 2019).…”

Parenting Practices, Family Obligation, and Adolescents’ Academic Adjustment: Cohort Differences with Social Change in China

“…Because cultural values are adapted to sociodemographic ecologies, cultural values are shifting from collectivism to individualism (Greenfield, 2009). This trend has been demonstrated by empirical evidence from different countries, such as the United States (Greenfield, 2013), Germany (Younes & Reips, 2017), Russia (Skrebyte, Garnett, & Kendal, 2016), and Japan (Hamamura, 2012).…”

Culture, Work, and Subjective Well-Being: The Role of LMX and Resilience in Spanish and Chinese Cultures

“…The cultural approach distinguishes between horizontal individualism/vertical collectivism configurations [45][46][47]. The individualism-collectivism (IC) dimension is generally considered the most important cultural dimension for describing the effects of a society's culture on the values, cognition, behavior, and social relationships of its members [48]. On the one hand, collectivist cultures foster the development of an interdependent self.…”