1984
DOI: 10.3758/bf03333807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal resolution of successive brief stimuli for the tongue and hand

Abstract: The temporal resolving power of the tactile sensory system was examined by obtaining fusion thresholds for a two-pulse vibratory stimulus. Fusion thresholds were obtained from the tongue and thenar eminence of the hand for 24 adult subjects. The means of the fusion thresholds for the tongue (24.63 msec) for the thenar eminence (24.73 msec) were found to be statistically similar. The similarity in fusion thresholds for the two test sites suggests that for this suprathreshold task the tactile modality responds a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asynchrony detection tasks have been carried out with somatosensory input, using a variety of stimuli including vibrotactile stimulation (Petrosino and Fucci 1984), mechanical taps (Gescheider 1966), and electrocutaneous shock (Uttal 1959;Rosner 1961). The locus of stimulation has varied considerably across studies, with common sites being fingertips (Elliott et al 2010;Huang et al 2012), tongue, and thenar eminence (Petrosino and Fucci 1984). Substantial variability in asynchrony detection thresholds has been found in tactile studies, possibly attributable to the variation in stimuli type and the location of stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asynchrony detection tasks have been carried out with somatosensory input, using a variety of stimuli including vibrotactile stimulation (Petrosino and Fucci 1984), mechanical taps (Gescheider 1966), and electrocutaneous shock (Uttal 1959;Rosner 1961). The locus of stimulation has varied considerably across studies, with common sites being fingertips (Elliott et al 2010;Huang et al 2012), tongue, and thenar eminence (Petrosino and Fucci 1984). Substantial variability in asynchrony detection thresholds has been found in tactile studies, possibly attributable to the variation in stimuli type and the location of stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%