2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3084528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Solar Photovoltaic Generation Capacity Reduction From Wildfire Smoke

Abstract: Wildfire smoke and other particulate matter can substantially inhibit solar photovoltaic (PV) generation production. While solar PV facilities may not be located in areas with a high fire risk, smoke from wildfires can travel hundreds of kilometers impacting a large number of facilities. This paper proposes a geospatial wildfire PV capacity model to quantify the anticipated temporal reduction in PV capacity due to wildfire smoke. A case study using data for two time periods from the 2020 California wildfires a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
17
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the smoke plumes persistent over the region during 7, 8, 10, and 11 September, solar power production was reduced compared to typical conditions by approximately 10%-30% during peak production hours (here considered 19-23 UTC or 12-16 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)). Our findings agree well with those from previous studies focused on wildfire smoke impacts on solar reduction [22,36], including during the 2020 season in the Western U.S. [20,61]. In contrast, 9 September and the 12-16 September period featured solar production much closer to what is expected under typical conditions (less than 7% reduction) because the smoke plumes were transported out of the region.…”
Section: California Energy Market Operationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the smoke plumes persistent over the region during 7, 8, 10, and 11 September, solar power production was reduced compared to typical conditions by approximately 10%-30% during peak production hours (here considered 19-23 UTC or 12-16 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)). Our findings agree well with those from previous studies focused on wildfire smoke impacts on solar reduction [22,36], including during the 2020 season in the Western U.S. [20,61]. In contrast, 9 September and the 12-16 September period featured solar production much closer to what is expected under typical conditions (less than 7% reduction) because the smoke plumes were transported out of the region.…”
Section: California Energy Market Operationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We will demonstrate the smoke effects during extreme wildfire conditions that plagued the Western U.S. in 2020. While recent studies examined the reduction in solar energy during to the 2020 wildfires [20,22,61], to the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study to investigate explicitly the impact of wildfire smoke on solar energy forecasts using a mesoscale NWP model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions of the TMS320LF2812 series controller used are as follows: complete the sampling of the output side AC voltage, AC current, and the input side DC voltage analog quantity, and then perform calculation processing; set the state detection function. In order to avoid device damage, overcurrent, overvoltage, undervoltage and other protection functions are set to ensure normal operation of the inverter; closed-loop control algorithm is used, so that the output voltage can track the set voltage in real time, so that the system output characteristics are normal [15] .…”
Section: Application Of Wireless Sensor Network Technology In Photovo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average PV output declined 34% over two days at a PV plant in Spain due to smoke [23], 7% at a solar lab in Australia during a controlled burn when AOD reached 0.25 (-27% at peak) [24], and ~10-50% at southern California solar plants during the 2020 wildfire season when AOD ranged from 0.5 -4.5 [25]. Examinations of solar resource and forecast models demonstrate the need to include aerosol parameters that account for smoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%