2006
DOI: 10.1118/1.2184441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: Automated assessment of registration accuracy

Abstract: Radiologists routinely compare multiple chest radiographs acquired from the same patient over time to more completely understand changes in anatomy and pathology. While such comparisons are achieved conventionally through a side-by-side display of images, image registration techniques have been developed to combine information from two separate radiographic images through construction of a "temporal subtraction image." Although temporal subtraction images provide a powerful mechanism for the enhanced visualiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 69 patients were among the 72 patients whose images were used in our previous registration accuracy study. 15 The digital images of these patients were used for this study only if ͑1͒ at least two temporally sequential CR images were available and ͑2͒ a computed tomography ͑CT͒ scan acquired within 1 week of the "most recent" CR image was available to differentiate misregistration artifacts from pathologic change. All available CR images prior to and including the most recent image were collected for a total of 193 CR images from these 69 patients.…”
Section: Iia Patient Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These 69 patients were among the 72 patients whose images were used in our previous registration accuracy study. 15 The digital images of these patients were used for this study only if ͑1͒ at least two temporally sequential CR images were available and ͑2͒ a computed tomography ͑CT͒ scan acquired within 1 week of the "most recent" CR image was available to differentiate misregistration artifacts from pathologic change. All available CR images prior to and including the most recent image were collected for a total of 193 CR images from these 69 patients.…”
Section: Iia Patient Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported an automated method to identify temporal subtraction images that demonstrate suboptimal registration accuracy. 15 A database of 150 temporal subtraction images constructed from the computed radiography ͑CR͒ images of 72 patients was collected. The registration accuracy of these images was rated subjectively using a 5-point scale ranging from "5-excellent" to "1-poor;" ratings of 3, 4, or 5 reflected clinically acceptable subtraction images, and ratings of 1 or 2 reflected clinically unacceptable images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishida et al 78 improved the quality of subtraction images of the chest through an iterative warping approach. Armato et al 82 later developed an automated approach to the evaluation of temporal subtraction image quality.…”
Section: Enhanced Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale was expanded to allow a finer granularity of rating that ranged from 1.0 to 5.9, in increments of 0.1. 18 The 0.1 rating increment allowed the radiologists to express ratings that captured more subtle differences in registration accuracy while at the same time preserving the opportunity to evaluate the assigned ratings on the more coarse, discrete 5-point scale. Prior to rating the subtraction images, the radiologists were shown a sampling of the images so that they could appreciate the range of registration accuracies within the database.…”
Section: Radiologist Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture information from local image neighborhoods, ROIs of dimension 64ϫ 64 pixels were placed with 33% overlap across the lung mask region; ROI dimension and overlap ratio were determined empirically from an independent pilot database of conventional subtraction images reported earlier. 18 The number of ROIs placed within the lung mask regions of the conventional subtraction images, the soft-tissue subtraction images, and the hybrid subtraction images ranged from 18-113 ͑mean: 64͒, 25-117 ͑mean: 65͒, and 21-117 ͑mean: 65͒, respectively.…”
Section: Automated Analysis Of Temporal Subtraction Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%