2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/828/2/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Variability From the Two-Component Advective Flow Solution and Its Observational Evidence

Abstract: In the propagating oscillatory shock model, the oscillation of the post-shock region, i.e., the Compton cloud, causes the observed low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs). The evolution of QPO frequency is explained by the systematic variation of the Compton cloud size, i.e., the steady radial movement of the shock front, which is triggered by the cooling of the post-shock region. Thus, analysis of the energy-dependent temporal properties in different variability timescales can diagnose the dynamics a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum of the lags at different QPO frequencies shows that for χ set-1 the hard lags increase monotonically with energy up to QPO frequency of ∼ 2.3 Hz and for χ set-2, up to a QPO frequency of ∼ 2.62 Hz. This is similar to what we found in the transient source XTE J1550-564 (Dutta & Chakrabarti 2016). This behavior suggests that net observed time lag of the high-energy photons depends on the relative contribution of the different physical processes responsible for the high energy emission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The spectrum of the lags at different QPO frequencies shows that for χ set-1 the hard lags increase monotonically with energy up to QPO frequency of ∼ 2.3 Hz and for χ set-2, up to a QPO frequency of ∼ 2.62 Hz. This is similar to what we found in the transient source XTE J1550-564 (Dutta & Chakrabarti 2016). This behavior suggests that net observed time lag of the high-energy photons depends on the relative contribution of the different physical processes responsible for the high energy emission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, time lag monotonically increases with energy for QPO frequency ∼ 1.48 Hz, but monotonically decreases from a frequency of ∼ 2.62 Hz onward for χ set-2. A similar type of behavior was also observed for the transient source XTE J1550-564 (Dutta & Chakrabarti 2016). Physical processes producing high-energy photons im- print energy-dependent time lags on the output radiation, therefore an energy dependence in the measured lags of high energy photons is naturally expected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work from Dutta & Chakrabarti (2016) and Chatterjee, Chakrabarti & Ghosh (2017), implementing the TCAF model (Chakrabarti et al 2008), linked the QPO frequency to the size of the Centrifugal pressure supported Boundary Layer (CENBOL), which serves as the corona in the TCAF model. These studies suggested that changes in the size of the CENBOL can explain the change in sign of the time lag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%