2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010gb003787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variation and climate dependence of soil respiration and its components along a 3000 m altitudinal tropical forest gradient

Abstract: [1] To simulate the effect of temperature on soil respiration rates, we translocated soil cores among four sites (3030, 1500, 1000, and 200 m asl) along an altitudinal tropical forest gradient in the Peruvian Andes, traversing a difference in mean annual temperature of 13.9°C. Rates of total (R s ) and heterotrophic (R sh ) respiration were measured twice a month from April 2007 to March 2009 and additionally for full 24 h periods. The diurnal range in R s increased with altitude; this variation was mainly roo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, if we do not consider the direction of soil monolith transfer, both high and lowelevation soils had 44 % greater CO 2 flux when they were incubated in the low-elevation site than those incubated in the high-elevation site, indicating that the temperature difference between the two sites determined the different CO 2 flux rates. In combination with higher soil C stock at the higher-elevation site (Table 1), similar CO 2 flux rate between both soils incubated in situ implies that more C would be stored in the soil at the high-elevation site (Zimmermann et al 2009(Zimmermann et al , 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if we do not consider the direction of soil monolith transfer, both high and lowelevation soils had 44 % greater CO 2 flux when they were incubated in the low-elevation site than those incubated in the high-elevation site, indicating that the temperature difference between the two sites determined the different CO 2 flux rates. In combination with higher soil C stock at the higher-elevation site (Table 1), similar CO 2 flux rate between both soils incubated in situ implies that more C would be stored in the soil at the high-elevation site (Zimmermann et al 2009(Zimmermann et al , 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The d 13 C of DOC and POC typically become progressively enriched deeper in the soil profile (Wynn et al 2004), a result of kinetic fractionation during the decomposition of soil organic matter, which leads to the accumulation of 13 C in the remaining organic material. Accompanying the enrichment of d 13 C, the molar C : N decreases with increasing soil depth (Rasse et al 2006;Zimmermann et al 2010) as microbial processing respires the carbon, which is then lost as CO 2 , but continues to cycle the nitrogen through the microbial community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite an increasing body of empirical data from tropical forests, there is a lack of agreement on several issues. For instance, diel variations in Rsoil have been observed in some evergreen tropical forests, but not in others [33][34][35][36][37][38]. That issue underlies an important concern: most measurements of tropical forest Rsoil are made only in the daytime, especially in remote locations.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That issue underlies an important concern: most measurements of tropical forest Rsoil are made only in the daytime, especially in remote locations. If fluxes are significantly different at night than during daylight hours, then we have a poor grasp of what average tropical forest Rsoil truly is [35]. Additionally, daytime photosynthesis by a productive tree canopy may drive diel variations in Rsoil, via temporally variable canopy-to-root carbon translocation [39][40][41].…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%