2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9318-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variation of b value associated with M ∼4 earthquakes in the reservoir-triggered seismic environment of the Koyna–Warna region, Western India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can result in short-term variations of M c , which, if ignored, can lead to spurious results and misinterpretations (Kagan, 2004;Hainzl, 2013). Thus, a temporal resolution of M c is necessary to get unbiased parameter estimations of seismicity models such as the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model (Ogata, 1988;Zhuang et al, 2012) and to evaluate variations of statistical parameters such as the b-value (e.g., Imoto, 1991;Hainzl and Fischer, 2002;Mallika et al, 2013;Schurr et al, 2014;Huang and Beroza, 2015) or Omori c-value (e.g., Shcherbakov et al, 2004;Narteau et al, 2009;Davidsen et al, 2015). Both are important for physical interpretations and seismic-hazard estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can result in short-term variations of M c , which, if ignored, can lead to spurious results and misinterpretations (Kagan, 2004;Hainzl, 2013). Thus, a temporal resolution of M c is necessary to get unbiased parameter estimations of seismicity models such as the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model (Ogata, 1988;Zhuang et al, 2012) and to evaluate variations of statistical parameters such as the b-value (e.g., Imoto, 1991;Hainzl and Fischer, 2002;Mallika et al, 2013;Schurr et al, 2014;Huang and Beroza, 2015) or Omori c-value (e.g., Shcherbakov et al, 2004;Narteau et al, 2009;Davidsen et al, 2015). Both are important for physical interpretations and seismic-hazard estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network is further strengthened by 3 new stand-alone stations and upgrading the short-period seismometers with broadband REFTEK sensors during January 2011, having a total of 13 seismic stations presently. The seismicity during the study period, with a cutoff magnitude M L 1.8 as derived by Mallika et al (2012), is shown along with earthquakes of M C 3.5 for the present study, in Fig. 1 and is also listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The b -value indirectly measures the stress of a seismic area [ 36 ]. Generally, the b -value of reservoir-triggered seismicity is larger than that associated with tectonic earthquakes [ 37 ]. The estimation of the b -value can be performed by using several techniques; in this study, we employ the maximum likelihood method [ 38 ]: where < M > is the mean magnitude of earthquake dataset with magnitude larger or equal to that of completeness M c , while Δ M bin is the width of the binning of the catalogue [ 39 ], which is typically 0.1.…”
Section: The Gutenberg–richter Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%