2002
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporally Jittered Speech Produces Performance Intensity, Phonetically Balanced Rollover in Young Normal-Hearing Listeners

Abstract: This study investigates whether temporally jittered stimuli will produce performance-intensity, phonetically balanced (PI-PB) rollover in young adults with normal hearing. Although not yet explicitly stated in the literature, there is clinical and theoretical evidence to suggest that PI-PB rollover, such as that found in cases of acoustic neuroma, is caused by neural dyssynchrony in the auditory system. Sixteen participants were tested with intact and temporally jittered word lists in quiet at 40, 55, 65, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another explanation is that speech understanding in NH listeners can exhibit either no change or a small drop in performance with increasing presentation levels (Miranda & Pichora-Fuller, 2002). We did not observe a decrease in the perception of temporal cues with increasing levels in our NH data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another explanation is that speech understanding in NH listeners can exhibit either no change or a small drop in performance with increasing presentation levels (Miranda & Pichora-Fuller, 2002). We did not observe a decrease in the perception of temporal cues with increasing levels in our NH data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Decreased neural synchrony may be one of the mechanisms underlying the reduced ability to process temporal cues with increasing levels in CI listeners. For instance, Miranda and Pichora-Fuller (2002) demonstrated that the introduction of temporal jitter to the speech stimuli, a simulation of neural desynchrony, resulted in a decline of word recognition performance at high presentation levels in younger NH listeners. With aging, the retrocochlear neural substrates may be subjected to further pathological changes (Hughes et al, 2010;Makary et al, 2011;Otte et al, 1978;Roque et al, 2019;Sergeyenko et al, 2013;Tremblay et al, 2003;Walton et al, 1998;Willott, 1991), which might exacerbate performance decline with increasing levels in older CI users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sought a manipulation that would decrease the intelligibility of the word pairs by the same amount as the babble (91% accuracy) but would distort the acoustic form of the words themselves, rather than mask them with a second signal. To do so, we chose to use a jittering procedure (Miranda & Pichora-Fuller, 2002;Pichora-Fuller, Schneider, MacDonald, Pass, & Brown, 2007). To understand how jittering distorts a sound, consider an undistorted signal, y(t).…”
Section: Experiments 4: Distorting the Words-partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstructed signal, therefore, was x H (t) + y(t). For a more detailed description of the general procedure see Miranda and Pichora-Fuller (2002) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%