2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporally resolved differential proteomic analysis of human ventricular CSF for monitoring traumatic brain injury biomarker candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass-spectrometry has been used to detect small amounts of GFAP and better characterise the post-translational modifications of GFAP (Herskowitz et al, 2010;Cunningham et al, 2013;Hanrieder et al, 2009;Ishigami et al, 2005;Joachim et al, 2007;Nomura et al, 2009;Ekegren et al, 2006). An important finding from these studies was that compared to other proteins GFAP is an extremely stable and robust candidate biomarker for massspectrometry (Ekegren et al, 2006).…”
Section: Mass-spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass-spectrometry has been used to detect small amounts of GFAP and better characterise the post-translational modifications of GFAP (Herskowitz et al, 2010;Cunningham et al, 2013;Hanrieder et al, 2009;Ishigami et al, 2005;Joachim et al, 2007;Nomura et al, 2009;Ekegren et al, 2006). An important finding from these studies was that compared to other proteins GFAP is an extremely stable and robust candidate biomarker for massspectrometry (Ekegren et al, 2006).…”
Section: Mass-spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Despite tissue heterogeneity, the protein expression in the disk might not be representative for the entire tumor. 49 These new technologies have been used successfully to quantitatively and qualitatively characterize existing cancer markers in prostate cancer 50 and to detect several disease-associated proteins in tissue samples 51 or complex biological specimens, such as serum, 52 cerebrospinal fluid, 51 nipple aspirates, 53 pancreatic juice, 54 saliva, 55 and urine. 56 Although these technologies have demonstrated their suitability, they still provide only limited information about the spatial variability of the cancer proteome.…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sample, a volume corresponding to 100 mg total protein (determined by Bradford protein assay) was aliquoted, dried down and labeled with iTRAQ TM 114-117 as described previously [24]. After iTRAQ TM labeling, equal volumes of the four samples were combined and 50 mL of the sample mixture was dried down under vacuum.…”
Section: Labeling Human Vcsf Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setup was used for the quantification of protein standards as well as in a case study to identify relative changes in proteome profiles in a set of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) samples collected from a patient recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). In a parallel study an evaluation of nanoLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF MS and iTRAQ TM labeling of potential protein biomarkers in vCSF have been performed [24]. PolyE-323 modified capillaries in CE [25] respectively, using the following procedure: The samples were redissolved in 20 mL dissolution buffer, 1 mL 1 M urea solution (instead of SDS as suggested in the standard protocol) for protein denaturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%