2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.412485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary Contracts and Employee Effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors postulate that, in addition to shirking as a cause, workers gradually learn how to work as little as possible and that, because a worker's ability is not initially observable and is largely gauged by output, workers dedicate a higher level of effort in the earlier months, which declines the longer the worker holds the post. Engellandt and Riphahn (2005) found that workers under temporary contracts dedicate more effort to their work than permanent employees and that the probability of a temporary worker working unpaid overtime is 60 per cent greater than for permanent workers.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Economic and Job Security On Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors postulate that, in addition to shirking as a cause, workers gradually learn how to work as little as possible and that, because a worker's ability is not initially observable and is largely gauged by output, workers dedicate a higher level of effort in the earlier months, which declines the longer the worker holds the post. Engellandt and Riphahn (2005) found that workers under temporary contracts dedicate more effort to their work than permanent employees and that the probability of a temporary worker working unpaid overtime is 60 per cent greater than for permanent workers.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Economic and Job Security On Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these effects may be dampened if fixed-term contracts are probation periods and workers therefore have incentives not to report absent(Ichino & Riphahn, 2005;Riphahn & Thalmaier, 2001;Engellandt & Riphahn, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%