Temporary layoffs, short-time work and COVID-19: the case of a dual labour market

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to study the type of short-time work (STW) schemes implemented in Spain to preserve jobs and workers’ incomes during the COVID-19 crisis and the corresponding labour market outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A dynamic macroeconomic model of job creation and destruction of the search and matching type in a dual labour market. Findings The model shows that the availability of STW schemes does not necessarily prevent a large increase in unemployment and job destruction. The quantitative effects depend on the degree of subsidization of payroll taxes and on the design of the policy. A scenario with a moderate degree of subsidization and where the subsidy is independent of the reduction in hours worked is the least harmful for both welfare and fiscal deficit. The cost of such a strategy is a higher unemployment rate. Concerning heterogeneous effects, the unemployed are the ones who experience the strongest distributional changes. Originality/value The effectiveness of STW schemes in dual labour markets using a search and matching model in the context of the COVID-19 crisis has not been analysed elsewhere. The literature has emphasized the importance of dynamics, labour market institutions and workers’ heterogeneity to understand workforce adjustment decisions in the face of temporary shocks to de- mand especially when firms’ human capital is relevant. These elements are present in the model. In addition, this paper computes welfare and distributional effects and the cost of these policies.

The impact of COVID-19 on employment and income of vocational graduates in China: Evidence from surveys in January and July 2020

“…At last, an insignificant effect on weekly work hours might be explained by the trade-off of laying off employees and reducing working hours of each worker for the enterprises. Due to wage rigidity, it can be more difficult for employers to reduce work hours (as well as the wage), compared to dismissing employees ( Osuna & García, 2021 ; Rones, 1981 ; Schmitt-Grohé & Uribe, 2016 ). As a result, instead of reducing working hours, we find that employers in our study preferred laying off employees during labor demand contractions.…”

Reemployment premium effect of furlough programs: evaluating Spain’s scheme during the COVID-19 crisis

“…They found large and positive effects on headcount employment, arguing in favour of welfare-enhancing effects, especially under temporary shocks, when liquidity constraints and labour market rigidities generate an inefficient excess of layoffs in firms. Essentially, the literature verdict seems to resemble the conclusions drawn by Osuna and García-Pérez ( 2015 ) and Osuna and Pérez ( 2021 ) from Spain, pointing at the existing trade-off between maximizing job preservation and minimizing deadweight costs and fiscal deficits.…”

Quiet Quitting: Causes, Consequences And Suggestions

“…Therefore, businesses burdened their employees with more than the work and responsibility they had to do during and after the pandemic (Cerullo, 2023). Despite everything, the lucky employees could continue their jobs, while the unlucky ones were dismissed due to economic conditions (Osuna & García Pérez, 2022). Therefore, it was inevitable that such behaviors applied to employees by managers and businesses would have an organizational counterpart in employees' eyes.…”