2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2366294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary Workers are Not Free-Riders: An Experimental Investigation

Abstract: We conduct an artefactual field experiment to study whether the individual preferences and propensity to cooperate of temporary workers differ from permanent contract workers. We find that temporary and permanent contract workers have different other-regarding preferences, but display similar contribution patterns in an anonymous Public Good Game. Students, instead, are more selfish and contribute less than temporary and permanent workers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a prisoner's dilemma, students cooperate less than white‐collar workers (Bigoni, Casari, and Camera ) or bicycle messengers (Burks, Carpenter, and Goette ). Similarly, students are less prosocial than rural and urban citizens in a public good game (Gächter and Herrmann ), than rural villagers in the appropriation of common‐pool resources (Cardenas ), and than employees in a dictator game (Carpenter, Burks, and Verhoogen ; Dragone, Galeotti, and Orsini ). The gap remains when one compares students and professionals , that is self‐selected subjects with a high degree of expertise who ordinarily deal with situations resembling the experimental task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a prisoner's dilemma, students cooperate less than white‐collar workers (Bigoni, Casari, and Camera ) or bicycle messengers (Burks, Carpenter, and Goette ). Similarly, students are less prosocial than rural and urban citizens in a public good game (Gächter and Herrmann ), than rural villagers in the appropriation of common‐pool resources (Cardenas ), and than employees in a dictator game (Carpenter, Burks, and Verhoogen ; Dragone, Galeotti, and Orsini ). The gap remains when one compares students and professionals , that is self‐selected subjects with a high degree of expertise who ordinarily deal with situations resembling the experimental task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%