1984
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198406000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporomandibular joint repositioning and exercise performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, 2 mm increase in vertical dimension was determined as the thickness of mouthguard in this study. However, the present study found that no significant change in maximum anaerobic power or muscular ability at the knee joint occurred when 2 mm raised full-coverage mouthguards were applied, which is consistent with previous findings that a vertical increase in mandibular position was not related to physical performance 25,26,35. Based on these results, a 2 mm increase in vertical position of the mandible is thought to have little systemic effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, 2 mm increase in vertical dimension was determined as the thickness of mouthguard in this study. However, the present study found that no significant change in maximum anaerobic power or muscular ability at the knee joint occurred when 2 mm raised full-coverage mouthguards were applied, which is consistent with previous findings that a vertical increase in mandibular position was not related to physical performance 25,26,35. Based on these results, a 2 mm increase in vertical position of the mandible is thought to have little systemic effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, some studies based on double-blind tests reported inconsistent and non-significant results, and argued that previously reported positive effects of intraoral appliances were due to placebo effects resulting from inadequate experimental designs such as lack of double-blind method. 25 , 26 On the other hand, Abduljabbar et al in a placebo controlled study found that when a mouthguard was applied in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients with loss of vertical dimension in several occlusal conditions, strengths of shoulder and knee joints improved significantly. 27 Thus, controversy over the systemic effects of intraoral appliances including mouthguards persists, 28 and although many studies supported the positive systemic effects of intraoral appliances, it is difficult to draw a solid conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are consistent with the observation that sensorimotor signals elicited during isometric clenching are very effective in increasing the excitability of spinal motoneurons (Miyahara et al, 1996). On the other hand, correction of TMJ disorders by splints does not seem to affect motor performance (McArdle et al, 1984), while there is evidence that changes in the occlusal condition may affect locomotion (Okubo et al, 2010; Maurer et al, 2015) and the associated postural stabilization in normal subjects (Ohlendorf et al, 2014), as well as the overall motility in Parkinsonian patients (Nomoto et al, 2013). Finally, recent evidence indicates that in subjects showing an unbalance in sensorimotor orofacial activity (consisting in an asymmetric activation of left and right masseter muscles during clenching) the reestablishment of a symmetric condition by bite wearing enhances the speed of execution in a complex sensorimotor task (De Cicco et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, in turn, have failed to observe alteration of muscle strength as a result of the use of oral appliances ( Cetin et al, 2009 ; Allen et al, 2014 ; Golem and Arent, 2015 ), thus questioning the aforementioned ergogenic effects. These results are further reinforced by studies using double-blind tests which claimed that performance enhancements by use of MORAs and other stabilizing splints are simply a result of placebo effects ( Burkett and Bernstein, 1983 ; Allen et al, 1984 ; McArdle et al, 1984 ; Chiodo and Rosenstein, 1986 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Significant increases in muscle strength of the upper and lower extremities and improvements in vertical jump height have been observed for athletes wearing oral devices. Some of this work has been criticized, however, primarily because of weak experimental design and lack of control conditions ( Jakush, 1982 ; McArdle et al, 1984 ). Other studies, in turn, have failed to observe alteration of muscle strength as a result of the use of oral appliances ( Cetin et al, 2009 ; Allen et al, 2014 ; Golem and Arent, 2015 ), thus questioning the aforementioned ergogenic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%