Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses

Abstract

"Landscape approaches" seek to provide tools and concepts for allocating and managing land to achieve social, economic, and environmental objectives in areas where agriculture, mining, and other productive land uses compete with environmental and biodiversity goals. Here we synthesize the current consensus on landscape approaches. This is based on published literature and a consensus-building process to define good practice and is validated by a survey of practitioners. We find the landscape approach has been refined in response to increasing societal concerns about environment and development tradeoffs. Notably, there has been a shift from conservation-orientated perspectives toward increasing integration of poverty alleviation goals. We provide 10 summary principles to support implementation of a landscape approach as it is currently interpreted. These principles emphasize adaptive management, stakeholder involvement, and multiple objectives. Various constraints are recognized, with institutional and governance concerns identified as the most severe obstacles to implementation. We discuss how these principles differ from more traditional sectoral and project-based approaches. Although no panacea, we see few alternatives that are likely to address landscape challenges more effectively than an approach circumscribed by the principles outlined here.food security | integrated development approaches | social ecological systems | agriculture environment trade offs | Convention on Biological Diversity

Environmental change: prospects for conservation and agriculture in a southwest Australia biodiversity hotspot

“…This may be accomplished through policy interventions, awareness raising initiatives, and incentives schemes that integrate social-ecological thinking into conservation planning. This also requires an iterative and flexible process of negotiation, decision-making, and reevaluation, one informed by science but shaped by human values and aspirations (Sayers et al 2013). …”

Fit-for-Purpose Institutions? An Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation in the Agricultural Landscape of the Tasmanian Midlands, Australia

“…Conserving biodiversity is a challenging task irrespective of location but it is even more challenging and complex given the multiple demands on agricultural landscapes. There is an expanding global interest in enhancing agricultural productivity and maintaining rural livelihoods whilst ensuring biodiversity and ecosystem services are conserved (Dobrovolski, Loyola, da Fonseca, Diniz--Filho, & Araújo, 2014;Sayer et al, 2013). Our case study, the Tasmanian Midlands of Australia, exemplifies these challenges and provides an ideal testing ground for exploring institutional fit.…”

Europe: the paradox of landscape change : A case-study based contribution to the understanding of landscape transitions

“…An integrated landscape approach (Sayer et al 2013) could offer a new perspective for future development, which would suit complex SES such as we found in our study. This landscape approach gives due consideration to: (1) different stakeholders, sectors and scales in a landscape (2) adaptive and participatory management of change processes; and (3) social learning and capacity building.…”

“…Agricultural-and forestry expansion often compromise biodiversity, and lead to encroachment of natural areas (Brussaard et al 2010;Sayer et al 2013). In general, land use intensification negatively affects environmental quality and biodiversity (Petit and Elbersen 2006).…”

“…The landscape is considered to be a complex system by many authors (Antrop et al 2013;Sayer et al 2013;Walker et al 2006). The different disciplines or ways of viewing the landscape must not be considered in isolation, but rather must be combined.…”