2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten simple rules for designing analogue science games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other studies, the method used confirms that not only do individual game sessions lead to dissimilar results (Illingworth and Wake, 2021), but also that each audience member has unique perceptions of the messages conveyed.…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Participant Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to other studies, the method used confirms that not only do individual game sessions lead to dissimilar results (Illingworth and Wake, 2021), but also that each audience member has unique perceptions of the messages conveyed.…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Participant Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As discussion is found to be the key to most of the learning in game communication (Neset et al, 2020), it seems that simply more time is needed; which is in line with the argument that the simpler and more familiar the game, the better participants are able to have simultaneous discussions and gameplay (Illingworth and Wake, 2021) .…”
Section: Moderationmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within this circle, players engage in activities governed by specific rules and structures, suspending real-world norms and embracing the game's alternate reality. This suspension allows us to move beyond any hierarchies that may exist outside the gaming context, enabling interactions that might not be possible otherwise (Illingworth and Wake, 2021a). For instance, in the board game Monopoly, it is acceptable (if not essential) behaviour to try and bankrupt your fellow players by levying rental income on multiple properties, behaviour that (one would hope) is viewed as being morally repugnant away from the gaming table.…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's crucial to recognise that there isn't a single 'general public'. Instead, multiple publics exist, each with their unique challenges and possibilities for engagement, as well as their motivations for engaging (or not) with science (Illingworth and Wake, 2021a). When deciding which public to engage with, it is therefore essential to carefully consider what and why you want to communicate, as well as the reasons for interacting with your chosen audience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%