2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten- to Twelve-Year Follow-Up of the Furlong Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stem and Threaded Acetabular Cup in Patients Younger Than 65 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 The Furlong fully HA-coated femoral component (Joint Replacement Industries, London, United Kingdom) has been extensively reported at mid term with comparable survivorship to that in the ten year report for the Freeman HA-coated stem. 1,[24][25][26][27] The results have been sustained in the long term, but with similar problems of acetabular failure. 28,29 Data from the Norwegian Hip Registry for proximally HA-coated femoral components show that there are four designs of implant with survivorship > 96% at ten years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…23 The Furlong fully HA-coated femoral component (Joint Replacement Industries, London, United Kingdom) has been extensively reported at mid term with comparable survivorship to that in the ten year report for the Freeman HA-coated stem. 1,[24][25][26][27] The results have been sustained in the long term, but with similar problems of acetabular failure. 28,29 Data from the Norwegian Hip Registry for proximally HA-coated femoral components show that there are four designs of implant with survivorship > 96% at ten years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These second-generation stems include fully coated and tapered stems with varied proximal coatings, such as fibre metal titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite [10][11][12]. There have been numerous midand long-term studies published that demonstrate excellent outcomes of a variety of second-generation, noncemented stems, with high rates of bony ingrowth, low rates of revision, and satisfied patients [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some might be related to the preference and experience of the surgeon, transactional versus total cost, presence of bone loss, and the ability to revise, repair, or salvage the prosthesis in the future. Several studies have reported on the excellent long-term outcome of cementless implants [1,5,6]. We particularly recommend cemented long stems in patients with limited bone loss, and in older patients.…”
Section: Clinical Faceoffmentioning
confidence: 99%