2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.268831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten Truths about Tax Shelters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent tax avoidance strategies produce book-tax differences and enable managers to reduce the firm's tax liability without reducing financial statement net income. Some strategies produce temporary book-tax differences, but shelters that produce permanent book-tax differences are the most sought after (Treasury 1999;Weisbach 2002). Tax shelters that permanently reduce the firm's ETR are a win-win for managers; these strategies simultaneously reduce taxable income and increase after-tax financial statement income.…”
Section: Incentives To Report Aggressivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent tax avoidance strategies produce book-tax differences and enable managers to reduce the firm's tax liability without reducing financial statement net income. Some strategies produce temporary book-tax differences, but shelters that produce permanent book-tax differences are the most sought after (Treasury 1999;Weisbach 2002). Tax shelters that permanently reduce the firm's ETR are a win-win for managers; these strategies simultaneously reduce taxable income and increase after-tax financial statement income.…”
Section: Incentives To Report Aggressivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent differences occur when income or an expense is recognized under one system but never under the other. An shelter, therefore, reduces the amount of income reported to the fisc, without affecting the amount of income reported to shareholders, and creates a permanent rather than temporary difference (Weisbach, 2002).…”
Section: Book -Tax Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Justice Scalia suggests, it would raise serious questions about prohibitions on adult incest, prostitution, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity. 121 (I do not mention his suggestion that the Court has questioned laws forbidding masturbation, 122 for one reason: There are no laws forbidding masturbation!) Now it might be possible, even under the autonomy reading, to justify most or all of those prohibitions on the ground that they counteract concrete harms, sufficient to support the intrusion on a presumptively protected right.…”
Section: B Autonomy Simpliciter or Desuetude-informed Autonomy?mentioning
confidence: 99%