2018
DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-18-00396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten-year clinical outcome of patients treated with a drug-eluting stent in the proximal left anterior descending artery segment compared with patients stented in other non-left main coronary segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the PCI arm the risk of mortality or MACCE did not differ significantly irrespective of the involvement of a P-LAD, which is in line with recent reports, 21–23 and presumably due to the fact that lesion characteristics such as large reference vessel diameter, minimal tortuosity and higher blood flow are all favourable for PCI. Only for MI there was a statistically significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction between revascularisation strategies and a P-LAD lesion (p=0.038).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the PCI arm the risk of mortality or MACCE did not differ significantly irrespective of the involvement of a P-LAD, which is in line with recent reports, 21–23 and presumably due to the fact that lesion characteristics such as large reference vessel diameter, minimal tortuosity and higher blood flow are all favourable for PCI. Only for MI there was a statistically significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction between revascularisation strategies and a P-LAD lesion (p=0.038).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also we did not have scheduled information on kidney function, another known predictor of long-term outcome [14], and that information of the left ventricular function was not available in the study database. However, a history of a previous myocardial infarction that may serve as a surrogate of a reduced left ventricular function was not a predictor of STF, only of major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death as we previously reported [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Data on long-term outcome derived from randomized studies and registries may be limited by inclusion of selected patients, loss to follow-up, and incomplete data on endpoints other than death. In the SORT-OUT II study, the patients included were representative of those undergoing PCI during the inclusion period, the 10-year follow-up was 99.2% complete, and all events were carefully adjudicated, as previously described [1,7,8]. So, to address some of the aforementioned issues and uncertainties to the long-term outcomes after coronary artery stenting, the main purpose of the present study was, using data from the SORT-OUT II, to demonstrate and quantitate the variation in outcomes depending on patients, lesion, and stent characteristics and to determine the predictors of the 10-year risk of stent treatment failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10‐year mortality rates were similar for patients with proximal LAD and nonproximal LAD stents. The incidence of combined clinical endpoints such as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target revascularization was low in the proximal LAD group 9 . While these results were controversial, we can explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The incidence of combined clinical endpoints such as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target revascularization was low in the proximal LAD group. 9 While these results were controversial, we can explain these differences. By comparing the risk characteristics of previous studies, we found that patients with many comorbidities or an extensive history of PCI may have received coronary artery bypass grafting instead of PCI at the time of study inclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%