2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten-year clinical outcomes for patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A validation cohort data set employed the data of IC patients in the FP group. 10 Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the analyses were performed using JMP statistical software (version 14.2.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A validation cohort data set employed the data of IC patients in the FP group. 10 Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the analyses were performed using JMP statistical software (version 14.2.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an external validation cohort, the performance of the developed model was examined by the Kaplan–Meier curves to assess for discrimination. A validation cohort data set employed the data of IC patients in the FP group 10 . Two‐sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4,5 The femoropopliteal artery is the most frequent location within PAD requiring EVT, which sometimes demands complex procedures for lesions, including total occlusion. 6,7 Indeed, approximately 30% to 50% of femoropopliteal artery lesions showed total occlusion in a real-world EVT registry. [8][9][10] In contrast, the prevalence of total occlusion in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry was reported to be 3% to 5%, and showed a considerable difference between PAD and CAD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%