Ten years of knowledge representation for health care (2009–2018): Topics, trends, and challenges

Abstract

Background: In the last ten years, the international workshop on knowledge representation for health care (KR4HC) has hosted outstanding contributions of the artificial intelligence in medicine community pertaining to the formalization and representation of medical knowledge for supporting clinical care. Contributions regarding modeling languages, technologies and methodologies to produce these models, their incorporation into medical decision support systems, and practical applications in concrete medical settings have been the main contributions and the basis to define the evolution of this field across Europe and worldwide. Objectives: Carry out a review of the papers accepted in KR4HC in the 2009-2018 decade, analyze and characterize the topics and trends within this field, and identify challenges for the evolution of the area in the near future. Methods: We reviewed the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the 112 papers that were accepted to the workshop, identified the medical and technological topics involved in these works, provided a classification of these papers in medical and technological perspectives and obtained the timeline of these topics in order to determine interest growths and declines. The experience of the authors in the field and the evidences after the review were the basis to propose a list of challenges of knowledge representation in health care for the future. Results: The most generic knowledge representation methods are ontologies (31%), semantic web related formalisms (26%), decision tables and rules (19%), logic (14%), and probabilistic models (10%). From a medical informatics perspective, knowledge is mainly represented as computer interpretable clinical guidelines (43%), medical domain ontologies (26%), and electronic health care records (22%). Within the knowledge lifecycle, contributions are found in knowledge generation (38%), knowledge specification (24%), exception detection and management (12%), knowledge enactment (8%), temporal knowledge and reasoning (7%), and knowledge sharing and maintenance (7%). The clinical emphasis of knowledge is mainly related to clinical treatments (27%), diagnosis (13%), clinical quality indicators (13%), and guideline integration for multimorbid patients (12%). According to the level of development of the works presented, we distinguished four maturity levels: formal (22%), implementation (52%), testing (13%), and deployment (2%) levels. Some papers described technologies for specific clinical issues or diseases, mainly cancer (22%) and diseases of the circulatory system (20%). Chronicity and comorbidity were present in 10% and 8% of the papers, respectively. Conclusions: KR4HC is a stable community, still active after ten years. A persistent focus has been knowledge representation, with an emphasis on semantic-web ontologies and on clinical-guideline based decision-support. Among others, two topics receive growing attention: integration of computer-interpretable guideline knowledge for the management of multimorbidity patients, and patie...

A Review of AI and Data Science Support for Cancer Management

“…Other frequently discussed aspects of behavior are related to mental well-being and include depression [102], distress and anxiety [1,2]. In [102] Chow et al present the iCanThrive mobile app that helps women’s cancer survivors reduce symptoms of depression.…”

“…These systems demonstrate human-like artificial intelligence for supporting medical diagnosis, prevention, and care [1]. The knowledge that forms the basis for the AI-based support is acquired from clinical guidelines, evidence-based studies or experts, or it can be mined from electronic health records (EHRs) [2]. With the explosion in the availability of health data, collected in EHRs or acquired via wearable sensors, the scope of AI methods in medicine [3] has widened to include such data-centric methods that may be used to generate medical knowledge that drives the AI-based systems.…”

Digital Health Interventions in Physiotherapy: Development of Client and Health Care Provider Survey Instruments

“…Findings from this study highlight the complexities of knowledge representation within digital health taxonomies and in the digital health environment. Riaño et al [ 23 ] suggested that knowledge representation in health is a complex area, particularly as the domain evolves in the face of advances in technology, such as artificial intelligence. The WHO’s DHI framework is a significant contribution to digital health and informatics research and practice reporting, via its conceptualization of the various functions of DHIs for reporting purposes [ 5 ].…”

Natural Language Processing for Smart Healthcare

“…To achieve whole person health, health knowledge population and medical education are essential since they can help people improve their health literacy and develop healthy living habits. Through knowledge engineering, accurate and complete medical knowledge bases can be established to promote the popularization of medical knowledge among the population [90]- [93], [101]- [104], [186]. Specifically, people can easily access medical knowledge through question answering systems [187], [188], information retrieval systems [83], [85], and machine translation systems [1], [134], [189], [190], facilitating the popularization and education of medical knowledge.…”