1990
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1990.70.3.719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tennis Serving Velocity and Accuracy

Abstract: The temporal constraints of tennis serves were manipulated as a percentage of maximum service velocity. The velocity conditions were 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90%. Elite tennis players (N = 15) completed 10 serves at each velocity. Three error measures (total variability, constant error, and variable error) were analyzed separately for target accuracy, accuracy of ball velocity, and proportional error in velocity.Significant total variability and variable error were found for proportional error in velocity. Both mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was expected based on the results of Cauraugh et al (1990), Johnson (1957), and Van den Tillaar andEttema, (2003, 2006). In contrast to dart throwing (Etnyre, 1998), speed does not seem to have a negative influence on accuracy in tennis.…”
Section: Speed á Accuracy Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This was expected based on the results of Cauraugh et al (1990), Johnson (1957), and Van den Tillaar andEttema, (2003, 2006). In contrast to dart throwing (Etnyre, 1998), speed does not seem to have a negative influence on accuracy in tennis.…”
Section: Speed á Accuracy Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Indermill and Husak (1984) showed that executing a fast discrete movement (throwing) at around 75% is more accurate than faster movements. In our study it was shown that at instructions V a and A v the velocities were 96% and 92% and thereby also much higher than the 85% in which accuracy does not change much anymore (Cauraugh, Gabert & White, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These results differ from those of previous studies involving dart throwing , where the longer throwing distance showed a greater decrement in performance accuracy than could be accounted for geometrically. Such results were interpreted as illustrations of Fitts' Law (Cauraugh et al, 1990;Crossman and Goodeve, 1963;Etnyre, 1998;Fitts, 1954;Newell et al, 1980;Pachella, 1974;Sherwood & Schmidt, 1980;Viitasalo et al, 2001), which describes a trade-off between force and accuracy in muscle contraction. The reason for the failure to demonstrate this trade-off in the present study is unknown, though other cases are known where Fitts' Law appears not to be obeyed (e.g., Cauraugh et al, 1990).…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 92%