Tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives: a comparison of materials and methods

Oilo, G; Olsson, S.

doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(05)80045-4

Cited by 40 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…High shear bond strengths to occlusal dentin were observed than buccal dentin[56] whereas tensile bond strengths were 20-30% higher for buccal dentin. [57] Thus, substrate location has to be specified while studying bond strength.…”

Section: Variables Influencing Macro-bond Strength Test Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adhesive systems are selected based on their bond strengths achieved while testing in laboratories. These bond strengths can predict the longevity of a restoration to some extent. There were several discrepancies in the reported bond strengths. To critically review the reliability of macro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface. Relevant literature published between January 1983 and May 2013 was collected from PubMed database, Google scholar, and hand-searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials. Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate-related factors, factors related to specimen properties, preparation of specimens, and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed. There is lack of a standard format for reporting the bond strength tests, which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives.

show abstract

Section: Variables Influencing Macro-bond Strength Test Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Measuring bond strength of dentin adhesives shows a lot of variations in results; this is related not only to differences in test methods but also to differences in the dentin substrate. Comparing the tensile bond strength of adhesives applied on dentin located on the occlusal part ofthe crown with adhesives applied on dentin located on the buccai part of the crown has revealed large, significant differences in tensile bond strength (1). Furthermore, bond strength is not only related to the part of crown used.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The structure of dentin surfaces exposed for bond strength measurements

Olsson

Oilo

Adamczak

1993

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The structure of dentin on three different levels, near enamel, central, and deep dentin, was examined. The solid area available for bonding was studied in a scanning electron microscope (JSM 840) connected to a computer‐assisted image analysis instrument (IBAS 2). The number of tubule openings per unit area (frequency) and the area percentages of these tubule openings were recorded. Three dentin disks were obtained from both buccally and occlusally located dentin of a single tooth (third molars were used), and the two deeper levels were each 1.25 mm deeper than the level above. The disks showed an increasing number of tubules with an increasing diameter the deeper into the dentin they were cut. Disks from the occlusal part of the tooth showed, in general, a higher number and area percentage of tubule openings than the corresponding disks from the buccal part. The variation across each disk was also larger for disks from the occlusal part than from the buccal part of the tooth. This variation increased with increasing depth of dentin. The most solid dentin with the lowest variation was found in superficial disks of buccally located dentin.

show abstract

“…The two published bond strength values of EBS 5 , 6 are widely different at 17.2 MPa and 33.6 MPa .T h e d i s p a rity between bond strength measurements of the same mat e rial in different laborat o ries has been discussed previously 9 and is inherent in dentine bond strength testing. In any case, l a b o r at o ry bond strength m ay not be indicat i ve of clinical perform a n c e .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Clinical evaluation of EBS dentine bonding agent:one year results

Tyas

Burrow

2000

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are numerous dentine bonding agents c u r r e n t l y on the market, the majority of which adhere by means of infiltration of a hydrophilic p o l y m e r i z a b l e diacrylate into dentinal collagen exposed by acid treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of one such product, EBS dentine bonding, in nonundercut caries-free cervical lesions. Forty cavities were restored in eight patients of mean age 53 years. The manufacturer's instructions were followed, which involved essentially etching the enamel and dentine for 20 seconds with 32 per cent phosphoric acid, application and evaporation of EBS Primer, followed by placement and curing of EBS Bond, and restoring the cavity with Pertac II (ESPE) hybrid resin composite. Restorations were photographed at base line and one year for evaluation of marginal discolouration on a continuous linear rating scale. A t six months, one patient with four restorations was not available; the remaining 36 restorations were all present. At one year, one restoration was missing, giving a cumulative retention rate of over 97 per cent. One of the 36 restorations exhibited very mild marginal discolouration.Key words: Dental bonding, dentine bonding agents, acid etching, tooth abrasion therapy.(Received for publication October 1999. Revised January 2000. Accepted February 2000 did not occur in practice and clinical failure rates we r e high in non-undercut non-carious cervical lesions. Following the work of Nakabayashi et al., 4 almost all the current dentine bonding agents achieve a d h e s i o n mechanically by infiltration into the dentinal collagen, exposed by acid treatment of the dentine, by a hydrophilic polymerizable monomer (a 'primer'). The infiltrated collagen is termed the ' hy b ri d ' or ' r e s i n -r e i n f o r c e d ' l aye r , and the methacrylate groups on its surface can then bond chemically to the subsequently placed resin composite, assisted by an intermediate layer of 'adhesive' or 'bond' which acts as a wetting agent.2 Commercial products commonly employ simultaneous enamel and dentine etching, in order to enhance the efficiency of the bonding procedure.One such material is EBS (ESPE Dental AG, Seefeld, Germany).The etch consists of 32 per cent phosphoric acid, the Primer is an aqueous solution of hy d r ox ye t hy l m e t h a c ry l ate (HEMA) and m e t h a c ryl magnesium chelate (MMC), and the Bond is malonic acid alkyl methacrylate (MAM) and bis-methacrylates. There are limited published data on EBS. A tensile bond strength of 9.8 MPa, 5 and shear bond strengths of 17.2 MPa5 and 33.6 MPa, 6 have been reported. In a clinical study, van Dijken 7 reported a zero one year loss rate of zero for Pertac (ESPE Dental AG, Seefeld, Germany) resin composite restorations bonded with EBS in nonc a ri o u s c e rvical lesions (NCCL). H owe ve r , t h i s appears to be the only study of this type available.The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance, with respect to retention and marg...

show abstract

Tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives: a comparison of materials and methods

Cited by 40 publications

References 10 publications

Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I

Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I

The structure of dentin surfaces exposed for bond strength measurements

Clinical evaluation of EBS dentine bonding agent:one year results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About