2020
DOI: 10.1002/pc.25864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile failure prediction of a short fiber or particle composite

Abstract: As any failure of a short fiber reinforced composite (SFRC) is caused by a matrix failure, an accurate prediction of the latter is fundamentally important. This is achievable only when the matrix homogenized stresses are converted into true values. The conversion is made by multiplying the homogenized stresses with matrix stress concentration factors (SCFs) in the composite. Only a longitudinal SCF of the matrix in the SFRC needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, a CCA (concentric cylinder assemblage) model together with infinity boundary conditions was chosen for the RVE geometry so that exact elastic solutions were available. In [ 35 ], a finite volume RVE containing a single short fiber specified with periodic boundary conditions was adopted. A numerical comparison study for all these different K 11 values was carried out, and is plotted in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, a CCA (concentric cylinder assemblage) model together with infinity boundary conditions was chosen for the RVE geometry so that exact elastic solutions were available. In [ 35 ], a finite volume RVE containing a single short fiber specified with periodic boundary conditions was adopted. A numerical comparison study for all these different K 11 values was carried out, and is plotted in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an un-convergent solution was reached, the differences of the resulting K 11 values between the use of t = 0.99 and t = 0.999 were less than 5%. Furthermore, the analytical K 11 derived in this work is essentially the same as that based on an FEM solution [ 35 ], although a finite RVE geometry with different boundary conditions has been used in the FEM approach. More details regarding the FEM approach can refer to [ 35 ].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations