1996
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199602150-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile Properties of Nondegenerate Human Lumbar Anulus Fibrosus

Abstract: The observed variations in tensile behavior of multiple-layer anulus samples indicate that larger variations in tensile modulus and failure properties occur with radial position in the disc than from anterior to posterolateral regions. This pattern is likely related to site-specific variations in the tensile properties of the single-layer samples of anulus fibrosus lamellae and the organization of successive lamellae and their interactions. The results of the present study suggest that factors other than age, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
208
5
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
32
208
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted stress}stretch relations remained convex to stretches of 0.3 in the con"ned compression protocols, which would be the maximum allowed stretch based on an initial solid content of 0.3 (Best et al, 1994) and the biphasic constraint of intrinsic incompressibility (Holmes and Mow, 1990). In addition, convexity was predicted in tensile tests beyond the reported failure stretches of 1.8 for a radial tension protocol (Fujita et al, 1997) and 1.15 for a circumferential tension protocol (Ebara et al, 1996). Since strict convexity is a su$cient condition for in cremental stability and uniqueness (Ogden, 1997), we regard the proposed strain energy function (11), along with the reported material constants, as being physically plausible for the range of deformations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The predicted stress}stretch relations remained convex to stretches of 0.3 in the con"ned compression protocols, which would be the maximum allowed stretch based on an initial solid content of 0.3 (Best et al, 1994) and the biphasic constraint of intrinsic incompressibility (Holmes and Mow, 1990). In addition, convexity was predicted in tensile tests beyond the reported failure stretches of 1.8 for a radial tension protocol (Fujita et al, 1997) and 1.15 for a circumferential tension protocol (Ebara et al, 1996). Since strict convexity is a su$cient condition for in cremental stability and uniqueness (Ogden, 1997), we regard the proposed strain energy function (11), along with the reported material constants, as being physically plausible for the range of deformations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(11), the best-"t values of (� , � , � , � , � , � , � , � , � ) � � � � � � � � �� were (0.001, !0.737, !3.289, !6.496, 0.4091, 17.713, � � � � � � � � � �� �� resulted in a �� value of 0.35. A"radial con"ned compression (Iatridis et al, 1998); B"axial con"ned compression (Iatridis et al, 1998); C"radial tension (Fujita et al, 1997); D"circumferential tension (Ebara et al, 1996). Solid curves"mean experimental response $1 standard deviation; open circles"theoretical prediction of measured stress}stretch response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations