2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile properties of rat femoral bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and volumetric bone mineral density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A stress riser notch was placed at the mid-diaphysis of each femur with markers placed at each side used as reference points for the camera to be able to assess mid-axis strain during testing. The prepped femur was mounted into a previously described tensile apparatus [34] and was loaded to failure at a strain rate of 0.005 s -1 (Synergy 200, MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) (Figure 2 ). A digital camera, which was previously calibrated with a calibration glass, (PixeLINK CMOS microscopy camera model PL-B681C, Ottawa, ON, Canada) captured images at a rate of 20 frames/s throughout testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stress riser notch was placed at the mid-diaphysis of each femur with markers placed at each side used as reference points for the camera to be able to assess mid-axis strain during testing. The prepped femur was mounted into a previously described tensile apparatus [34] and was loaded to failure at a strain rate of 0.005 s -1 (Synergy 200, MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) (Figure 2 ). A digital camera, which was previously calibrated with a calibration glass, (PixeLINK CMOS microscopy camera model PL-B681C, Ottawa, ON, Canada) captured images at a rate of 20 frames/s throughout testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher BV/TV or Tb.Th. results in an increased maximum tensile strength, compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of the tissue (Cory et al, 2010;Nazarian et al, 2011). The increased strength has a negative effect on the machinability of bone with pure water jets (Tikhomirov et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For P , a minimal threshold needs to be met before bone material is removed, which lies between 30 and 45 MPa depending on the bone tissue and D (Honl et al, 2000a, b;den Dunnen et al, 2013a). The pressure range in which the pressure can be considered to have a linear influence is up to 120 MPa (Mohamed, 2004;Orbanic and Junkar, 2004). Thus, the volume of and velocity of the water is a good measure for the total volume of material removal, but only when no extreme values for D, t and P are used to achieve this volume and velocity of the water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the compressive modulus of bone is 5-6 times of the tensile modulus. The difference also exists in other bones (Cory et al, 2010;Nazarian et al, 2011). However, till now, no work gives the prediction of cancellous bone in proximal femur with consideration of the bi-modulus behavior of bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much attention has been paid on the relations between the loading environments and the micro-structure of bone (Whitehouse and Dyson 1974;Cowin 1986;Odgarrd et al 1997;Zhu et al 2006;Cory et al 2010;Nazarian et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%