2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile properties, strain rate sensitivity, and activation volume of additively manufactured 316L stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
53
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
9
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[67,69] Thus, the values of m are estimated from the gradient of a double logarithmic plot of H/3 versusε and shown as inset in Figure 9, whereas the evolution of The values of m for the as-received disk are estimated as %0.041 (center) and %0.040 (edge), which are of one order higher than 0.0061 obtained for coarse-grained 316L SS [70] and other typical coarse-grained FCC metals, e.g., %0.004 for high-purity Cu, [71] %0.0028 for pure Ni, [72] and %0.004 for Al 99.5. [73] However, these values are consistent with the m values for AM 316L SS as explained by Li et al, [74] ranging from 0.02 to 0.03, when measured by tensile tests at different strain rates and strain rate jump tests. In fact, the high values of m obtained for the as-received SLM-fabricated 316L SS in this study are close to or higher than those of CM FCC metals having nanosized grains, e.g., m ¼ 0.015-0.034 for pure Ni with grain sizes <100 nm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[67,69] Thus, the values of m are estimated from the gradient of a double logarithmic plot of H/3 versusε and shown as inset in Figure 9, whereas the evolution of The values of m for the as-received disk are estimated as %0.041 (center) and %0.040 (edge), which are of one order higher than 0.0061 obtained for coarse-grained 316L SS [70] and other typical coarse-grained FCC metals, e.g., %0.004 for high-purity Cu, [71] %0.0028 for pure Ni, [72] and %0.004 for Al 99.5. [73] However, these values are consistent with the m values for AM 316L SS as explained by Li et al, [74] ranging from 0.02 to 0.03, when measured by tensile tests at different strain rates and strain rate jump tests. In fact, the high values of m obtained for the as-received SLM-fabricated 316L SS in this study are close to or higher than those of CM FCC metals having nanosized grains, e.g., m ¼ 0.015-0.034 for pure Ni with grain sizes <100 nm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[80,81] However, it is closer to the value of 22-28b 3 reported by Li et al for AM 316L SS. [74] This discrepancy can be attributed to the difference in the testing method used to determine m, with tensile and strain rate jump tests used in the study by Li et al [74] and nanoindentation in this study. Nevertheless, the rather low V * p value in AM 316L SS compared with CM coarse-grained 316L SS and other FCC metals suggests the abundance of barriers to dislocation for deformation via plastic flow, including a mix of high-angle and low-angle GBs, pre-existing dislocations, nanoprecipitates, cellular structure networks, numerous fusion boundaries from solidified melt pools, and localized misorientations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A high work hardening rate is essential for good uniform elongation because it can help delay the localized deformation stress (necking) under tension 38 . The strain hardening exponent (n) of the cast and SLM samples was calculated using the Holloman-Ludwig equation 39 ; however, it is difficult to obtain a single power law fit, which was also found for other additive manufactured materials 14 . Values of~0.20 and 0.28 are obtained for the SLM sample at strains of 0.012-0.05 and 0.05-0.17, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLM sample has a higher value of n than the cast sample, which can be explained by the presence of a high density of internal defects, disconnected precipitates, and a hierarchical microstructure (giving back stress) 14,15 , which significantly influence the strain-hardening behavior. An interaction between the nanotwining and the disconnected precipitates is also observed and may contribute to the strain hardening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation